CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2008-1977

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Published: Apr 27, 2008 | Modified: Aug 01, 2019
CVSS 3.x
N/A
Source:
NVD
CVSS 2.x
4.3 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Internationalization (i18n) Drupal module 5.x before 5.x-2.3 and 5.x-1.1, and 6.x before 6.x-1.0 beta 1, allows remote attackers to change node translation relationships via unspecified vectors.

Weakness

The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Localizer Localizer_project 5.x-1.0 (including) 5.x-1.0 (including)
Localizer Localizer_project 5.x-1.1 (including) 5.x-1.1 (including)
Localizer Localizer_project 5.x-1.2 (including) 5.x-1.2 (including)
Localizer Localizer_project 5.x-1.3 (including) 5.x-1.3 (including)
Localizer Localizer_project 5.x-1.4 (including) 5.x-1.4 (including)
Localizer Localizer_project 5.x-1.5 (including) 5.x-1.5 (including)
Localizer Localizer_project 5.x-1.6 (including) 5.x-1.6 (including)
Localizer Localizer_project 5.x-1.7 (including) 5.x-1.7 (including)
Localizer Localizer_project 5.x-1.8 (including) 5.x-1.8 (including)
Localizer Localizer_project 5.x-1.9 (including) 5.x-1.9 (including)
Localizer Localizer_project 5.x-1.10 (including) 5.x-1.10 (including)
Localizer Localizer_project 5.x-1.x-dev (including) 5.x-1.x-dev (including)
Localizer Localizer_project 5.x-2.x-dev (including) 5.x-2.x-dev (including)
Localizer Localizer_project 5.x-3.0 (including) 5.x-3.0 (including)
Localizer Localizer_project 5.x-3.1 (including) 5.x-3.1 (including)
Localizer Localizer_project 5.x-3.2 (including) 5.x-3.2 (including)
Localizer Localizer_project 5.x-3.3 (including) 5.x-3.3 (including)

Potential Mitigations

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
  • Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
  • Use the “double-submitted cookie” method as described by Felten and Zeller:
  • When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user’s machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
  • Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
  • This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]

References