CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2010-0434

Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

Published: Mar 05, 2010 | Modified: Feb 13, 2023
CVSS 3.x
N/A
Source:
NVD
CVSS 2.x
4.3 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
RedHat/V2
2.6 LOW
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

The ap_read_request function in server/protocol.c in the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.x before 2.2.15, when a multithreaded MPM is used, does not properly handle headers in subrequests in certain circumstances involving a parent request that has a body, which might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a crafted request that triggers access to memory locations associated with an earlier request.

Weakness

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Http_server Apache 2.0.35 (including) 2.0.64 (excluding)
Http_server Apache 2.2.0 (including) 2.2.15 (excluding)
JBEWS 1.0 for RHEL 4 RedHat httpd22-0:2.2.14-11.jdk6.ep5.el4 *
Red Hat Certificate System 7.3 RedHat ant-0:1.6.5-1jpp_1rh *
Red Hat Certificate System 7.3 RedHat avalon-logkit-0:1.2-2jpp_4rh *
Red Hat Certificate System 7.3 RedHat axis-0:1.2.1-1jpp_3rh *
Red Hat Certificate System 7.3 RedHat classpathx-jaf-0:1.0-2jpp_6rh *
Red Hat Certificate System 7.3 RedHat classpathx-mail-0:1.1.1-2jpp_8rh *
Red Hat Certificate System 7.3 RedHat geronimo-specs-0:1.0-0.M4.1jpp_10rh *
Red Hat Certificate System 7.3 RedHat jakarta-commons-modeler-0:2.0-3jpp_2rh *
Red Hat Certificate System 7.3 RedHat log4j-0:1.2.12-1jpp_1rh *
Red Hat Certificate System 7.3 RedHat mx4j-1:3.0.1-1jpp_4rh *
Red Hat Certificate System 7.3 RedHat pcsc-lite-0:1.3.3-3.el4 *
Red Hat Certificate System 7.3 RedHat rhpki-ca-0:7.3.0-20.el4 *
Red Hat Certificate System 7.3 RedHat rhpki-java-tools-0:7.3.0-10.el4 *
Red Hat Certificate System 7.3 RedHat rhpki-kra-0:7.3.0-14.el4 *
Red Hat Certificate System 7.3 RedHat rhpki-manage-0:7.3.0-19.el4 *
Red Hat Certificate System 7.3 RedHat rhpki-native-tools-0:7.3.0-6.el4 *
Red Hat Certificate System 7.3 RedHat rhpki-ocsp-0:7.3.0-13.el4 *
Red Hat Certificate System 7.3 RedHat rhpki-tks-0:7.3.0-13.el4 *
Red Hat Certificate System 7.3 RedHat tomcat5-0:5.5.23-0jpp_4rh.16 *
Red Hat Certificate System 7.3 RedHat xerces-j2-0:2.7.1-1jpp_1rh *
Red Hat Certificate System 7.3 RedHat xml-commons-0:1.3.02-2jpp_1rh *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 RedHat httpd-0:2.0.52-41.ent.7 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 RedHat httpd-0:2.2.3-31.el5_4.4 *
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Web Server 1 for RHEL 5 RedHat httpd-0:2.2.14-1.2.6.jdk6.ep5.el5 *
Apache2 Ubuntu dapper *
Apache2 Ubuntu devel *
Apache2 Ubuntu hardy *
Apache2 Ubuntu intrepid *
Apache2 Ubuntu jaunty *
Apache2 Ubuntu karmic *
Apache2 Ubuntu upstream *

Extended Description

There are many different kinds of mistakes that introduce information exposures. The severity of the error can range widely, depending on the context in which the product operates, the type of sensitive information that is revealed, and the benefits it may provide to an attacker. Some kinds of sensitive information include:

Information might be sensitive to different parties, each of which may have their own expectations for whether the information should be protected. These parties include:

Information exposures can occur in different ways:

It is common practice to describe any loss of confidentiality as an “information exposure,” but this can lead to overuse of CWE-200 in CWE mapping. From the CWE perspective, loss of confidentiality is a technical impact that can arise from dozens of different weaknesses, such as insecure file permissions or out-of-bounds read. CWE-200 and its lower-level descendants are intended to cover the mistakes that occur in behaviors that explicitly manage, store, transfer, or cleanse sensitive information.

Potential Mitigations

  • Compartmentalize the system to have “safe” areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
  • Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

References