The socket implementation in net/core/sock.c in the Linux kernel before 2.6.35 does not properly manage a backlog of received packets, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by sending a large amount of network traffic, related to the sk_add_backlog function and the sk_rmem_alloc socket field. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2010-4251.
The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.
Name | Vendor | Start Version | End Version |
---|---|---|---|
Linux_kernel | Linux | * | 2.6.35 (excluding) |
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | RedHat | kernel-0:2.6.18-238.5.1.el5 | * |
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | RedHat | kernel-0:2.6.32-131.0.15.el6 | * |
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.0 EUS - Server Only | RedHat | kernel-0:2.6.32-71.31.1.el6 | * |
Linux | Ubuntu | hardy | * |
Linux | Ubuntu | lucid | * |
Linux | Ubuntu | upstream | * |
Linux-armadaxp | Ubuntu | upstream | * |
Linux-ec2 | Ubuntu | lucid | * |
Linux-ec2 | Ubuntu | maverick | * |
Linux-ec2 | Ubuntu | upstream | * |
Linux-fsl-imx51 | Ubuntu | lucid | * |
Linux-fsl-imx51 | Ubuntu | upstream | * |
Linux-lts-backport-maverick | Ubuntu | upstream | * |
Linux-lts-backport-natty | Ubuntu | upstream | * |
Linux-lts-backport-oneiric | Ubuntu | upstream | * |
Linux-lts-quantal | Ubuntu | upstream | * |
Linux-lts-raring | Ubuntu | upstream | * |
Linux-mvl-dove | Ubuntu | lucid | * |
Linux-mvl-dove | Ubuntu | maverick | * |
Linux-mvl-dove | Ubuntu | upstream | * |
Linux-source-2.6.15 | Ubuntu | dapper | * |
Linux-source-2.6.15 | Ubuntu | upstream | * |
Linux-ti-omap4 | Ubuntu | upstream | * |
Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:
The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.
The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute – and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.