Vulnerabilities
Misconfiguration
Compliance
CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2011-3192

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Published: Aug 29, 2011 | Modified: Apr 11, 2025
CVSS 3.x
N/A
Source:
NVD
CVSS 2.x
7.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
RedHat/V2
5 IMPORTANT
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu
MEDIUM
Vulnerability-free packages from our partners
root.io logo minimus.io logo echo.ai logo
Additional information
NVDhttps://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-3192
CWEhttps://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/400.html

The byterange filter in the Apache HTTP Server 1.3.x, 2.0.x through 2.0.64, and 2.2.x through 2.2.19 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory and CPU consumption) via a Range header that expresses multiple overlapping ranges, as exploited in the wild in August 2011, a different vulnerability than CVE-2007-0086.

Weakness

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

Affected Software

NameVendorStart VersionEnd Version
Http_serverApache2.0.35 (including)2.0.65 (excluding)
Http_serverApache2.2.0 (including)2.2.20 (excluding)
JBEWS 1.0 for RHEL 4RedHathttpd22-0:2.2.17-16.ep5.el4*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 Extended Lifecycle SupportRedHathttpd-0:2.0.46-78.ent*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4RedHathttpd-0:2.0.52-48.ent*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5RedHathttpd-0:2.2.3-53.el5_7.1*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5RedHathttpd-0:2.2.3-45.el5_6.2*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.3 Long LifeRedHathttpd-0:2.2.3-22.el5_3.3*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6RedHathttpd-0:2.2.15-9.el6_1.2*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.0 EUS - Server OnlyRedHathttpd-0:2.2.15-5.el6_0.1*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Web Server 1 for RHEL 5RedHathttpd-0:2.2.17-14.1.ep5.el5*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Web Server 1 for RHEL 6RedHathttpd-0:2.2.17-13.2.ep5.el6*
Red Hat JBoss Web Server 1.0RedHat*
Apache2Ubuntudevel*
Apache2Ubuntuhardy*
Apache2Ubuntulucid*
Apache2Ubuntumaverick*
Apache2Ubuntunatty*
Apache2Ubuntuupstream*

Potential Mitigations

  • Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:

  • The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.

  • The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute – and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.

References

Aqua Security is the largest pure-play cloud native security company, providing customers the freedom to innovate and run their businesses with minimal friction. The Aqua Cloud Native Security Platform provides prevention, detection, and response automation across the entire application lifecycle to secure the build, secure cloud infrastructure and secure running workloads wherever they are deployed.
Copyright © 2026 Aqua Security Software Ltd.   Privacy Policy | Terms of Use