CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2015-1417

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Published: Jul 25, 2017 | Modified: Apr 20, 2025
CVSS 3.x
7.5
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu

The inet module in FreeBSD 10.2x before 10.2-PRERELEASE, 10.2-BETA2-p2, 10.2-RC1-p1, 10.1x before 10.1-RELEASE-p16, 9.x before 9.3-STABLE, 9.3-RELEASE-p21, and 8.x before 8.4-STABLE, 8.4-RELEASE-p35 on systems with VNET enabled and at least 16 VNET instances allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (mbuf consumption) via multiple concurrent TCP connections.

Weakness

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Freebsd Freebsd 8.4 (including) 8.4 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 8.4-beta1 (including) 8.4-beta1 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 8.4-p11 (including) 8.4-p11 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 8.4-p12 (including) 8.4-p12 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 8.4-p13 (including) 8.4-p13 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 8.4-p14 (including) 8.4-p14 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 8.4-p15 (including) 8.4-p15 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 8.4-p16 (including) 8.4-p16 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 8.4-p17 (including) 8.4-p17 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 8.4-p19 (including) 8.4-p19 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 8.4-p2 (including) 8.4-p2 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 8.4-p20 (including) 8.4-p20 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 8.4-p21 (including) 8.4-p21 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 8.4-p22 (including) 8.4-p22 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 8.4-p23 (including) 8.4-p23 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 8.4-p24 (including) 8.4-p24 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 8.4-p26 (including) 8.4-p26 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 8.4-p27 (including) 8.4-p27 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 8.4-p3 (including) 8.4-p3 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 8.4-p30 (including) 8.4-p30 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 8.4-p33 (including) 8.4-p33 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 8.4-p34 (including) 8.4-p34 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 8.4-p4 (including) 8.4-p4 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 8.4-p7 (including) 8.4-p7 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 8.4-p8 (including) 8.4-p8 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 8.4-p9 (including) 8.4-p9 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 9.3 (including) 9.3 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 9.3-p1 (including) 9.3-p1 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 9.3-p10 (including) 9.3-p10 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 9.3-p12 (including) 9.3-p12 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 9.3-p13 (including) 9.3-p13 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 9.3-p16 (including) 9.3-p16 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 9.3-p19 (including) 9.3-p19 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 9.3-p2 (including) 9.3-p2 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 9.3-p20 (including) 9.3-p20 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 9.3-p3 (including) 9.3-p3 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 9.3-p5 (including) 9.3-p5 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 9.3-p6 (including) 9.3-p6 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 9.3-p7 (including) 9.3-p7 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 9.3-p8 (including) 9.3-p8 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 9.3-p9 (including) 9.3-p9 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 10.1 (including) 10.1 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 10.1-p1 (including) 10.1-p1 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 10.1-p10 (including) 10.1-p10 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 10.1-p12 (including) 10.1-p12 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 10.1-p15 (including) 10.1-p15 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 10.1-p16 (including) 10.1-p16 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 10.1-p2 (including) 10.1-p2 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 10.1-p3 (including) 10.1-p3 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 10.1-p4 (including) 10.1-p4 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 10.1-p5 (including) 10.1-p5 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 10.1-p6 (including) 10.1-p6 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 10.1-p7 (including) 10.1-p7 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 10.1-p8 (including) 10.1-p8 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 10.1-p9 (including) 10.1-p9 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 10.2 (including) 10.2 (including)

Potential Mitigations

  • Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:

  • The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.

  • The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute – and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.

References