CVE Vulnerabilities


Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

Published: Jun 25, 2015 | Modified: Dec 28, 2016
CVSS 3.x
CVSS 2.x

OpenStack Cinder before 2014.1.5 (icehouse), 2014.2.x before 2014.2.4 (juno), and 2015.1.x before 2015.1.1 (kilo) allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files via a crafted qcow2 signature in an image to the upload-to-image command.


The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Ubuntu_linux Canonical 15.04 (including) 15.04 (including)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux OpenStack Platform 5.0 (Icehouse) for RHEL 6 RedHat openstack-cinder-0:2014.1.4-1.1.el6ost *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux OpenStack Platform 5.0 (Icehouse) for RHEL 7 RedHat openstack-cinder-0:2014.1.4-1.1.el7ost *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux OpenStack Platform 6.0 (Juno) for RHEL 7 RedHat openstack-cinder-0:2014.2.3-3.1.el7ost *
Cinder Ubuntu upstream *
Cinder Ubuntu utopic *
Cinder Ubuntu vivid *

Extended Description

There are many different kinds of mistakes that introduce information exposures. The severity of the error can range widely, depending on the context in which the product operates, the type of sensitive information that is revealed, and the benefits it may provide to an attacker. Some kinds of sensitive information include:

Information might be sensitive to different parties, each of which may have their own expectations for whether the information should be protected. These parties include:

Information exposures can occur in different ways:

It is common practice to describe any loss of confidentiality as an “information exposure,” but this can lead to overuse of CWE-200 in CWE mapping. From the CWE perspective, loss of confidentiality is a technical impact that can arise from dozens of different weaknesses, such as insecure file permissions or out-of-bounds read. CWE-200 and its lower-level descendants are intended to cover the mistakes that occur in behaviors that explicitly manage, store, transfer, or cleanse sensitive information.

Potential Mitigations

  • Compartmentalize the system to have “safe” areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
  • Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.