CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2015-3448

Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

Published: Apr 29, 2015 | Modified: Dec 06, 2016
CVSS 3.x
N/A
Source:
NVD
CVSS 2.x
2.1 LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
RedHat/V2
2.1 LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

REST client for Ruby (aka rest-client) before 1.7.3 logs usernames and passwords, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading the log.

Weakness

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Rest-client Rest-client_project * 1.7.2 (including)
CloudForms Management Engine 5.4 RedHat cfme-0:5.4.0.5-1.el6cf *
CloudForms Management Engine 5.4 RedHat cfme-gemset-0:5.4.0.5-1.el6cf *
CloudForms Management Engine 5.4 RedHat cfme-vnc-plugin-0:1.0.0-2.el6cf *
CloudForms Management Engine 5.4 RedHat libdnet-0:1.12-11.el6cf *
CloudForms Management Engine 5.4 RedHat lshw-0:B.02.16-4.el6cf *
CloudForms Management Engine 5.4 RedHat netapp-manageability-sdk-0:4.0P1-3.el6cf *
CloudForms Management Engine 5.4 RedHat open-vm-tools-0:9.2.3-5.el6cf *
CloudForms Management Engine 5.4 RedHat prince-0:9.0r2-4.el6cf *
CloudForms Management Engine 5.4 RedHat pyliblzma-0:0.5.3-7.el6cf *
CloudForms Management Engine 5.4 RedHat ruby200-rubygem-bcrypt-ruby-0:3.0.1-2.el6cf *
CloudForms Management Engine 5.4 RedHat ruby200-rubygem-eventmachine-0:1.0.7-2.el6cf *
CloudForms Management Engine 5.4 RedHat ruby200-rubygem-ffi-0:1.9.8-1.el6cf *
CloudForms Management Engine 5.4 RedHat ruby200-rubygem-io-extra-0:1.2.8-1.el6cf *
CloudForms Management Engine 5.4 RedHat ruby200-rubygem-json-0:1.8.2-2.el6cf *
CloudForms Management Engine 5.4 RedHat ruby200-rubygem-nokogiri-0:1.5.11-2.el6cf *
CloudForms Management Engine 5.4 RedHat ruby200-rubygem-pg-0:0.12.2-9.el6cf *
CloudForms Management Engine 5.4 RedHat ruby200-rubygem-psych-0:2.0.13-1.el6cf *
CloudForms Management Engine 5.4 RedHat ruby200-rubygem-qpid_messaging-0:0.20.2-5.el6cf *
CloudForms Management Engine 5.4 RedHat ruby200-rubygem-therubyracer-0:0.11.0-5.el6cf *
CloudForms Management Engine 5.4 RedHat ruby200-rubygem-thin-0:1.3.1-9.el6cf *
CloudForms Management Engine 5.4 RedHat sneakernet_ca-0:0.1-2.el6cf *
CloudForms Management Engine 5.4 RedHat wmi-0:1.3.14-1.el6cf *
Red Hat Satellite 6.9 for RHEL 7 RedHat tfm-rubygem-rest-client-0:2.0.2-3.el7sat *
Red Hat Satellite 6.9 for RHEL 7 RedHat tfm-rubygem-rest-client-0:2.0.2-3.el7sat *
Ruby-rest-client Ubuntu artful *
Ruby-rest-client Ubuntu precise *
Ruby-rest-client Ubuntu trusty *
Ruby-rest-client Ubuntu upstream *
Ruby-rest-client Ubuntu utopic *
Ruby-rest-client Ubuntu vivid *
Ruby-rest-client Ubuntu wily *
Ruby-rest-client Ubuntu yakkety *
Ruby-rest-client Ubuntu zesty *

Extended Description

There are many different kinds of mistakes that introduce information exposures. The severity of the error can range widely, depending on the context in which the product operates, the type of sensitive information that is revealed, and the benefits it may provide to an attacker. Some kinds of sensitive information include:

Information might be sensitive to different parties, each of which may have their own expectations for whether the information should be protected. These parties include:

Information exposures can occur in different ways:

It is common practice to describe any loss of confidentiality as an “information exposure,” but this can lead to overuse of CWE-200 in CWE mapping. From the CWE perspective, loss of confidentiality is a technical impact that can arise from dozens of different weaknesses, such as insecure file permissions or out-of-bounds read. CWE-200 and its lower-level descendants are intended to cover the mistakes that occur in behaviors that explicitly manage, store, transfer, or cleanse sensitive information.

Potential Mitigations

  • Compartmentalize the system to have “safe” areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
  • Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

References