A remote code execution vulnerability in an Android runtime library in Android 4.x before 4.4.4, 5.0.x before 5.0.2, 5.1.x before 5.1.1, and 6.x before 2016-11-01 could enable an attacker using a specially crafted payload to execute arbitrary code in the context of an unprivileged process. This issue is rated as High due to the possibility of remote code execution in an application that uses the Android runtime. Android ID: A-30765246.
The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.
Name | Vendor | Start Version | End Version |
---|---|---|---|
Android | * | 6.0.1 (including) | |
Android | 4.0 (including) | 4.0 (including) | |
Android | 4.0.1 (including) | 4.0.1 (including) | |
Android | 4.0.2 (including) | 4.0.2 (including) | |
Android | 4.0.3 (including) | 4.0.3 (including) | |
Android | 4.0.4 (including) | 4.0.4 (including) | |
Android | 4.1 (including) | 4.1 (including) | |
Android | 4.1.2 (including) | 4.1.2 (including) | |
Android | 4.2 (including) | 4.2 (including) | |
Android | 4.2.1 (including) | 4.2.1 (including) | |
Android | 4.2.2 (including) | 4.2.2 (including) | |
Android | 4.3 (including) | 4.3 (including) | |
Android | 4.3.1 (including) | 4.3.1 (including) | |
Android | 4.4 (including) | 4.4 (including) | |
Android | 4.4.1 (including) | 4.4.1 (including) | |
Android | 4.4.2 (including) | 4.4.2 (including) | |
Android | 4.4.3 (including) | 4.4.3 (including) | |
Android | 5.0 (including) | 5.0 (including) | |
Android | 5.0.1 (including) | 5.0.1 (including) | |
Android | 5.1 (including) | 5.1 (including) | |
Android | 5.1.0 (including) | 5.1.0 (including) | |
Android | 6.0 (including) | 6.0 (including) | |
Android | Ubuntu | esm-apps/xenial | * |
Android | Ubuntu | trusty | * |
Android | Ubuntu | upstream | * |
Android | Ubuntu | vivid/stable-phone-overlay | * |
Android | Ubuntu | xenial | * |
Android | Ubuntu | yakkety | * |
Android | Ubuntu | zesty | * |
Access control involves the use of several protection mechanisms such as:
When any mechanism is not applied or otherwise fails, attackers can compromise the security of the product by gaining privileges, reading sensitive information, executing commands, evading detection, etc. There are two distinct behaviors that can introduce access control weaknesses: