CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2016-7777

Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

Published: Oct 07, 2016 | Modified: Apr 12, 2025
CVSS 3.x
6.3
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS 2.x
3.3 LOW
AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
RedHat/V2
4.9 MODERATE
AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:N
RedHat/V3
6.1 MODERATE
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

Xen 4.7.x and earlier does not properly honor CR0.TS and CR0.EM, which allows local x86 HVM guest OS users to read or modify FPU, MMX, or XMM register state information belonging to arbitrary tasks on the guest by modifying an instruction while the hypervisor is preparing to emulate it.

Weakness

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Xen Xen * 4.7.0 (including)
Xen Ubuntu devel *
Xen Ubuntu esm-infra/xenial *
Xen Ubuntu precise *
Xen Ubuntu trusty *
Xen Ubuntu xenial *

Extended Description

A race condition occurs within concurrent environments, and it is effectively a property of a code sequence. Depending on the context, a code sequence may be in the form of a function call, a small number of instructions, a series of program invocations, etc. A race condition violates these properties, which are closely related:

A race condition exists when an “interfering code sequence” can still access the shared resource, violating exclusivity. The interfering code sequence could be “trusted” or “untrusted.” A trusted interfering code sequence occurs within the product; it cannot be modified by the attacker, and it can only be invoked indirectly. An untrusted interfering code sequence can be authored directly by the attacker, and typically it is external to the vulnerable product.

Potential Mitigations

  • Minimize the usage of shared resources in order to remove as much complexity as possible from the control flow and to reduce the likelihood of unexpected conditions occurring.
  • Additionally, this will minimize the amount of synchronization necessary and may even help to reduce the likelihood of a denial of service where an attacker may be able to repeatedly trigger a critical section (CWE-400).

References