CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2016-9573

Out-of-bounds Read

Published: Aug 01, 2018 | Modified: Feb 12, 2023
CVSS 3.x
8.1
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
5.8 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:P
RedHat/V2
4.3 MODERATE
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
RedHat/V3
6.5 MODERATE
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

An out-of-bounds read vulnerability was found in OpenJPEG 2.1.2, in the j2k_to_image tool. Converting a specially crafted JPEG2000 file to another format could cause the application to crash or, potentially, disclose some data from the heap.

Weakness

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Openjpeg Uclouvain 2.1.2 (including) 2.1.2 (including)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 RedHat openjpeg-0:1.5.1-16.el7_3 *
Openjpeg Ubuntu esm-apps/xenial *
Openjpeg Ubuntu esm-infra-legacy/trusty *
Openjpeg Ubuntu trusty *
Openjpeg Ubuntu trusty/esm *
Openjpeg Ubuntu upstream *
Openjpeg Ubuntu xenial *
Openjpeg2 Ubuntu artful *
Openjpeg2 Ubuntu upstream *
Openjpeg2 Ubuntu xenial *
Openjpeg2 Ubuntu yakkety *
Openjpeg2 Ubuntu zesty *

Potential Mitigations

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • To reduce the likelihood of introducing an out-of-bounds read, ensure that you validate and ensure correct calculations for any length argument, buffer size calculation, or offset. Be especially careful of relying on a sentinel (i.e. special character such as NUL) in untrusted inputs.

References