CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2017-10613

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Published: Oct 13, 2017 | Modified: Apr 20, 2025
CVSS 3.x
5.5
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
2.1 LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu

A vulnerability in a specific loopback filter action command, processed in a specific logical order of operation, in a running configuration of Juniper Networks Junos OS, allows an attacker with CLI access and the ability to initiate remote sessions to the loopback interface with the defined action, to hang the kernel. Affected releases are Juniper Networks Junos OS 12.1X46 prior to 12.1X46-D55; 12.3X48 prior to 12.3X48-D35; 14.1 prior to 14.1R8-S4, 14.1R9; 14.1X53 prior to 14.1X53-D40; 14.2 prior to 14.2R4-S9, 14.2R7-S8, 14.2R8; 15.1 prior to 15.1F5-S3, 15.1F6, 15.1R4; 15.1X49 prior to 15.1X49-D60; 15.1X53 prior to 15.1X53-D47; 16.1 prior to 16.1R2. No other Juniper Networks products or platforms are affected by this issue.

Weakness

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Junos Juniper 12.1x46 (including) 12.1x46 (including)
Junos Juniper 12.1x46-d10 (including) 12.1x46-d10 (including)
Junos Juniper 12.1x46-d15 (including) 12.1x46-d15 (including)
Junos Juniper 12.1x46-d20 (including) 12.1x46-d20 (including)
Junos Juniper 12.1x46-d25 (including) 12.1x46-d25 (including)
Junos Juniper 12.1x46-d30 (including) 12.1x46-d30 (including)
Junos Juniper 12.1x46-d35 (including) 12.1x46-d35 (including)
Junos Juniper 12.1x46-d40 (including) 12.1x46-d40 (including)
Junos Juniper 12.1x46-d45 (including) 12.1x46-d45 (including)
Junos Juniper 12.1x46-d50 (including) 12.1x46-d50 (including)

Potential Mitigations

  • Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:

  • The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.

  • The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute – and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.

References