CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2017-12618

Out-of-bounds Read

Published: Oct 24, 2017 | Modified: Oct 31, 2018
CVSS 3.x
4.7
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
1.9 LOW
AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu

Apache Portable Runtime Utility (APR-util) 1.6.0 and prior fail to validate the integrity of SDBM database files used by apr_sdbm*() functions, resulting in a possible out of bound read access. A local user with write access to the database can make a program or process using these functions crash, and cause a denial of service.

Weakness

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 0.9.20 0.9.20
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 0.9.19 0.9.19
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 0.9.18 0.9.18
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 0.9.17 0.9.17
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 0.9.16 0.9.16
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 0.9.15 0.9.15
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 0.9.14 0.9.14
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 0.9.13 0.9.13
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 0.9.12 0.9.12
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 0.9.11 0.9.11
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 0.9.10 0.9.10
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 0.9.9 0.9.9
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 0.9.7 0.9.7
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 0.9.6 0.9.6
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 0.9.5 0.9.5
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 0.9.4 0.9.4
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 0.9.3 0.9.3
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 0.9.2 0.9.2
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 0.9.1 0.9.1
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.1.2 1.1.2
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.1.1 1.1.1
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.1.0 1.1.0
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.2.13 1.2.13
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.2.12 1.2.12
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.2.10 1.2.10
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.2.9 1.2.9
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.2.8 1.2.8
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.2.7 1.2.7
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.2.6 1.2.6
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.2.2 1.2.2
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.2.1 1.2.1
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.3.13 1.3.13
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.3.12 1.3.12
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.3.11 1.3.11
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.3.10 1.3.10
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.3.9 1.3.9
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.3.8 1.3.8
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.3.7 1.3.7
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.3.6 1.3.6
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.3.5 1.3.5
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.3.4 1.3.4
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.3.3 1.3.3
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.3.2 1.3.2
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.3.1 1.3.1
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.3.0 1.3.0
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.4.3 1.4.3
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.4.2 1.4.2
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.4.1 1.4.1
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.4.0 1.4.0
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.5.5 1.5.5
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.5.4 1.5.4
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.5.3 1.5.3
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.5.2 1.5.2
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.5.1 1.5.1
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.5.0 1.5.0
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.6.0 1.6.0
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.0.2 1.0.2
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.0.1 1.0.1
Portable_runtime_utility Apache 1.0.0 1.0.0

Potential Mitigations

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • To reduce the likelihood of introducing an out-of-bounds read, ensure that you validate and ensure correct calculations for any length argument, buffer size calculation, or offset. Be especially careful of relying on a sentinel (i.e. special character such as NUL) in untrusted inputs.

References