CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2017-15344

Integer Overflow or Wraparound

Published: Feb 15, 2018 | Modified: Feb 22, 2018
CVSS 3.x
7.5
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
7.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu

Huawei AR3200 with software V200R006C10, V200R006C11, V200R007C00, V200R007C01, V200R007C02, V200R008C00, V200R008C10, V200R008C20, V200R008C30 has an integer overflow vulnerability. The software does not sufficiently validate certain field in SCTP messages, a remote unauthenticated attacker could send a crafted SCTP message to the device. Successful exploit could cause system reboot.

Weakness

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound, when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This can introduce other weaknesses when the calculation is used for resource management or execution control.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Ar120-s_firmware Huawei v200r006c10 (including) v200r006c10 (including)
Ar120-s_firmware Huawei v200r007c00 (including) v200r007c00 (including)
Ar120-s_firmware Huawei v200r008c20 (including) v200r008c20 (including)
Ar120-s_firmware Huawei v200r008c30 (including) v200r008c30 (including)
Ar1200_firmware Huawei v200r007c01 (including) v200r007c01 (including)
Ar1200_firmware Huawei v200r007c02 (including) v200r007c02 (including)
Ar3200_firmware Huawei v200r006c11 (including) v200r006c11 (including)
Ar3200_firmware Huawei v200r008c00 (including) v200r008c00 (including)
Ar3200_firmware Huawei v200r008c10 (including) v200r008c10 (including)

Potential Mitigations

  • Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • If possible, choose a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • Use libraries or frameworks that make it easier to handle numbers without unexpected consequences.
  • Examples include safe integer handling packages such as SafeInt (C++) or IntegerLib (C or C++). [REF-106]
  • Perform input validation on any numeric input by ensuring that it is within the expected range. Enforce that the input meets both the minimum and maximum requirements for the expected range.
  • Use unsigned integers where possible. This makes it easier to perform validation for integer overflows. When signed integers are required, ensure that the range check includes minimum values as well as maximum values.
  • Understand the programming language’s underlying representation and how it interacts with numeric calculation (CWE-681). Pay close attention to byte size discrepancies, precision, signed/unsigned distinctions, truncation, conversion and casting between types, “not-a-number” calculations, and how the language handles numbers that are too large or too small for its underlying representation. [REF-7]
  • Also be careful to account for 32-bit, 64-bit, and other potential differences that may affect the numeric representation.

References