CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2017-17507

Out-of-bounds Read

Published: Dec 11, 2017 | Modified: Dec 19, 2017
CVSS 3.x
6.5
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
4.3 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
3.3 LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

In HDF5 1.10.1, there is an out of bounds read vulnerability in the function H5T_conv_struct_opt in H5Tconv.c in libhdf5.a. For example, h5dump would crash when someone opens a crafted hdf5 file.

Weakness

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Hdf5 Hdfgroup 1.10.1 (including) 1.10.1 (including)
Hdf5 Ubuntu artful *
Hdf5 Ubuntu bionic *
Hdf5 Ubuntu cosmic *
Hdf5 Ubuntu devel *
Hdf5 Ubuntu disco *
Hdf5 Ubuntu eoan *
Hdf5 Ubuntu esm-apps/bionic *
Hdf5 Ubuntu esm-apps/focal *
Hdf5 Ubuntu esm-apps/jammy *
Hdf5 Ubuntu esm-apps/noble *
Hdf5 Ubuntu esm-apps/xenial *
Hdf5 Ubuntu esm-infra-legacy/trusty *
Hdf5 Ubuntu focal *
Hdf5 Ubuntu groovy *
Hdf5 Ubuntu hirsute *
Hdf5 Ubuntu impish *
Hdf5 Ubuntu jammy *
Hdf5 Ubuntu kinetic *
Hdf5 Ubuntu lunar *
Hdf5 Ubuntu mantic *
Hdf5 Ubuntu noble *
Hdf5 Ubuntu oracular *
Hdf5 Ubuntu trusty *
Hdf5 Ubuntu trusty/esm *
Hdf5 Ubuntu upstream *
Hdf5 Ubuntu xenial *
Hdf5 Ubuntu zesty *

Potential Mitigations

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • To reduce the likelihood of introducing an out-of-bounds read, ensure that you validate and ensure correct calculations for any length argument, buffer size calculation, or offset. Be especially careful of relying on a sentinel (i.e. special character such as NUL) in untrusted inputs.

References