CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2017-3813

Missing Authorization

Published: Feb 09, 2017 | Modified: Oct 03, 2019
CVSS 3.x
7.8
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS 2.x
7.2 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu

A vulnerability in the Start Before Logon (SBL) module of Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client Software for Windows could allow an unauthenticated, local attacker to open Internet Explorer with the privileges of the SYSTEM user. The vulnerability is due to insufficient implementation of the access controls. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by opening the Internet Explorer browser. An exploit could allow the attacker to use Internet Explorer with the privileges of the SYSTEM user. This may allow the attacker to execute privileged commands on the targeted system. This vulnerability affects versions prior to released versions 4.4.00243 and later and 4.3.05017 and later. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvc43976.

Weakness

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Anyconnect_secure_mobility_client Cisco 4.0.00048 (including) 4.0.00048 (including)
Anyconnect_secure_mobility_client Cisco 4.0.00051 (including) 4.0.00051 (including)
Anyconnect_secure_mobility_client Cisco 4.0.00052 (including) 4.0.00052 (including)
Anyconnect_secure_mobility_client Cisco 4.0.00057 (including) 4.0.00057 (including)
Anyconnect_secure_mobility_client Cisco 4.0.00061 (including) 4.0.00061 (including)
Anyconnect_secure_mobility_client Cisco 4.1.00028 (including) 4.1.00028 (including)
Anyconnect_secure_mobility_client Cisco 4.1.02011 (including) 4.1.02011 (including)
Anyconnect_secure_mobility_client Cisco 4.1.04011 (including) 4.1.04011 (including)
Anyconnect_secure_mobility_client Cisco 4.1.06013 (including) 4.1.06013 (including)
Anyconnect_secure_mobility_client Cisco 4.1.06020 (including) 4.1.06020 (including)
Anyconnect_secure_mobility_client Cisco 4.1.08005 (including) 4.1.08005 (including)
Anyconnect_secure_mobility_client Cisco 4.2.00096 (including) 4.2.00096 (including)
Anyconnect_secure_mobility_client Cisco 4.2.01022 (including) 4.2.01022 (including)
Anyconnect_secure_mobility_client Cisco 4.2.01035 (including) 4.2.01035 (including)
Anyconnect_secure_mobility_client Cisco 4.2.02075 (including) 4.2.02075 (including)
Anyconnect_secure_mobility_client Cisco 4.2.03013 (including) 4.2.03013 (including)
Anyconnect_secure_mobility_client Cisco 4.2.04018 (including) 4.2.04018 (including)
Anyconnect_secure_mobility_client Cisco 4.2.04039 (including) 4.2.04039 (including)
Anyconnect_secure_mobility_client Cisco 4.2.05015 (including) 4.2.05015 (including)
Anyconnect_secure_mobility_client Cisco 4.2.06014 (including) 4.2.06014 (including)
Anyconnect_secure_mobility_client Cisco 4.3.00748 (including) 4.3.00748 (including)
Anyconnect_secure_mobility_client Cisco 4.3.01095 (including) 4.3.01095 (including)
Anyconnect_secure_mobility_client Cisco 4.3.02039 (including) 4.3.02039 (including)
Anyconnect_secure_mobility_client Cisco 4.3.03086 (including) 4.3.03086 (including)
Anyconnect_secure_mobility_client Cisco 4.3.04027 (including) 4.3.04027 (including)

Extended Description

Assuming a user with a given identity, authorization is the process of determining whether that user can access a given resource, based on the user’s privileges and any permissions or other access-control specifications that apply to the resource. When access control checks are not applied, users are able to access data or perform actions that they should not be allowed to perform. This can lead to a wide range of problems, including information exposures, denial of service, and arbitrary code execution.

Potential Mitigations

  • Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
  • Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
  • One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.

References