CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2017-5867

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Published: Mar 03, 2017 | Modified: Apr 20, 2025
CVSS 3.x
6.5
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
4 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu
MEDIUM
root.io logo minimus.io logo echo.ai logo

ownCloud Server before 8.1.11, 8.2.x before 8.2.9, 9.0.x before 9.0.7, and 9.1.x before 9.1.3 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (server hang and logfile flooding) via a one bit BMP file.

Weakness

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

Affected Software

NameVendorStart VersionEnd Version
OwncloudOwncloud*8.1.10 (including)
OwncloudOwncloud8.2.0 (including)8.2.0 (including)
OwncloudOwncloud8.2.1 (including)8.2.1 (including)
OwncloudOwncloud8.2.2 (including)8.2.2 (including)
OwncloudOwncloud8.2.3 (including)8.2.3 (including)
OwncloudOwncloud8.2.4 (including)8.2.4 (including)
OwncloudOwncloud8.2.5 (including)8.2.5 (including)
OwncloudOwncloud8.2.6 (including)8.2.6 (including)
OwncloudOwncloud8.2.7 (including)8.2.7 (including)
OwncloudOwncloud8.2.8 (including)8.2.8 (including)
OwncloudOwncloud9.0.0 (including)9.0.0 (including)
OwncloudOwncloud9.0.1 (including)9.0.1 (including)
OwncloudOwncloud9.0.2 (including)9.0.2 (including)
OwncloudOwncloud9.0.3 (including)9.0.3 (including)
OwncloudOwncloud9.0.4 (including)9.0.4 (including)
OwncloudOwncloud9.0.5 (including)9.0.5 (including)
OwncloudOwncloud9.0.6 (including)9.0.6 (including)
OwncloudOwncloud9.1.0 (including)9.1.0 (including)
OwncloudOwncloud9.1.1 (including)9.1.1 (including)
OwncloudOwncloud9.1.2 (including)9.1.2 (including)
OwncloudUbuntuprecise*
OwncloudUbuntutrusty*
OwncloudUbuntuupstream*

Potential Mitigations

  • Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:

  • The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.

  • The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute – and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.

References