CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2017-8872

Out-of-bounds Read

Published: May 10, 2017 | Modified: Sep 10, 2020
CVSS 3.x
9.1
CRITICAL
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
6.4 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:P
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
5.4 LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
Ubuntu
LOW

The htmlParseTryOrFinish function in HTMLparser.c in libxml2 2.9.4 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (buffer over-read) or information disclosure.

Weakness

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Libxml2 Xmlsoft 2.9.4 (including) 2.9.4 (including)
Libxml2 Ubuntu artful *
Libxml2 Ubuntu bionic *
Libxml2 Ubuntu cosmic *
Libxml2 Ubuntu devel *
Libxml2 Ubuntu disco *
Libxml2 Ubuntu eoan *
Libxml2 Ubuntu esm-infra/xenial *
Libxml2 Ubuntu focal *
Libxml2 Ubuntu groovy *
Libxml2 Ubuntu hirsute *
Libxml2 Ubuntu impish *
Libxml2 Ubuntu jammy *
Libxml2 Ubuntu precise/esm *
Libxml2 Ubuntu trusty *
Libxml2 Ubuntu trusty/esm *
Libxml2 Ubuntu upstream *
Libxml2 Ubuntu vivid/stable-phone-overlay *
Libxml2 Ubuntu xenial *
Libxml2 Ubuntu yakkety *
Libxml2 Ubuntu zesty *

Potential Mitigations

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • To reduce the likelihood of introducing an out-of-bounds read, ensure that you validate and ensure correct calculations for any length argument, buffer size calculation, or offset. Be especially careful of relying on a sentinel (i.e. special character such as NUL) in untrusted inputs.

References