CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2017-9118

Out-of-bounds Read

Published: Aug 02, 2018 | Modified: Aug 29, 2022
CVSS 3.x
7.5
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
5.3 MODERATE
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

PHP 7.1.5 has an Out of bounds access in php_pcre_replace_impl via a crafted preg_replace call.

Weakness

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Php Php 7.4.0 (including) 7.4.27 (excluding)
Php Php 8.0.0 (including) 8.0.14 (excluding)
Php Php 8.1.0 (including) 8.1.1 (excluding)
Php Php 7.1.5 (including) 7.1.5 (including)
Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 RedHat rh-php71-php-0:7.1.30-1.el7 *
Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.4 EUS RedHat rh-php71-php-0:7.1.30-1.el7 *
Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.5 EUS RedHat rh-php71-php-0:7.1.30-1.el7 *
Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.6 EUS RedHat rh-php71-php-0:7.1.30-1.el7 *
Php5 Ubuntu esm-infra-legacy/trusty *
Php5 Ubuntu precise/esm *
Php5 Ubuntu trusty *
Php5 Ubuntu trusty/esm *
Php7.0 Ubuntu esm-infra/xenial *
Php7.0 Ubuntu upstream *
Php7.0 Ubuntu xenial *
Php7.2 Ubuntu bionic *
Php7.2 Ubuntu cosmic *
Php7.2 Ubuntu disco *
Php7.4 Ubuntu focal *
Php8.0 Ubuntu impish *
Php8.1 Ubuntu jammy *
Php8.1 Ubuntu kinetic *
Php8.1 Ubuntu lunar *

Potential Mitigations

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • To reduce the likelihood of introducing an out-of-bounds read, ensure that you validate and ensure correct calculations for any length argument, buffer size calculation, or offset. Be especially careful of relying on a sentinel (i.e. special character such as NUL) in untrusted inputs.

References