CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2018-5748

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Published: Jan 25, 2018 | Modified: Nov 21, 2024
CVSS 3.x
7.5
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
RedHat/V2
1.5 LOW
AV:L/AC:M/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
RedHat/V3
3.3 LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Ubuntu
LOW
root.io logo minimus.io logo echo.ai logo

qemu/qemu_monitor.c in libvirt allows attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large QEMU reply.

Weakness

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

Affected Software

NameVendorStart VersionEnd Version
LibvirtRedhat- (including)- (including)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6RedHatlibvirt-0:0.10.2-64.el6*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7RedHatlibvirt-0:3.9.0-14.el7_5.4*
Red Hat Storage 3 for RHEL 6RedHatlibvirt-0:0.10.2-64.el6*
LibvirtUbuntuartful*
LibvirtUbuntuesm-infra-legacy/trusty*
LibvirtUbuntuesm-infra/xenial*
LibvirtUbuntuprecise/esm*
LibvirtUbuntutrusty*
LibvirtUbuntutrusty/esm*
LibvirtUbuntuxenial*

Potential Mitigations

  • Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:

  • The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.

  • The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute – and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.

References