CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2019-0046

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Published: Jul 11, 2019 | Modified: Nov 21, 2024
CVSS 3.x
6.5
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
6.1 MEDIUM
AV:A/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu

A vulnerability in the pfe-chassisd Chassis Manager (CMLC) daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) to the EX4300 when specific valid broadcast packets create a broadcast storm condition when received on the me0 interface of the EX4300 Series device. A reboot of the device is required to restore service. Continued receipt of these valid broadcast packets will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) against the device. Affected releases are Juniper Networks Junos OS: 16.1 versions above and including 16.1R1 prior to 16.1R7-S5; 17.1 versions prior to 17.1R3; 17.2 versions prior to 17.2R3; 17.3 versions prior to 17.3R3-S2; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R2; 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R3; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R2.

Weakness

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Junos Juniper 16.1 (including) 16.1 (including)
Junos Juniper 16.1-r1 (including) 16.1-r1 (including)
Junos Juniper 16.1-r2 (including) 16.1-r2 (including)
Junos Juniper 16.1-r3 (including) 16.1-r3 (including)
Junos Juniper 16.1-r3-s10 (including) 16.1-r3-s10 (including)
Junos Juniper 16.1-r3-s11 (including) 16.1-r3-s11 (including)
Junos Juniper 16.1-r4 (including) 16.1-r4 (including)
Junos Juniper 16.1-r5 (including) 16.1-r5 (including)
Junos Juniper 16.1-r6 (including) 16.1-r6 (including)
Junos Juniper 16.1-r6-s6 (including) 16.1-r6-s6 (including)

Potential Mitigations

  • Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:

  • The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.

  • The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute – and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.

References