CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2019-11470

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Published: Apr 23, 2019 | Modified: Nov 21, 2024
CVSS 3.x
6.5
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
7.1 HIGH
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
5.3 LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Ubuntu
LOW
root.io logo minimus.io logo echo.ai logo

The cineon parsing component in ImageMagick 7.0.8-26 Q16 allows attackers to cause a denial-of-service (uncontrolled resource consumption) by crafting a Cineon image with an incorrect claimed image size. This occurs because ReadCINImage in coders/cin.c lacks a check for insufficient image data in a file.

Weakness

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

Affected Software

NameVendorStart VersionEnd Version
ImagemagickImagemagick7.0.8-26-q16 (including)7.0.8-26-q16 (including)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7RedHatautotrace-0:0.31.1-38.el7*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7RedHatemacs-1:24.3-23.el7*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7RedHatImageMagick-0:6.9.10.68-3.el7*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7RedHatinkscape-0:0.92.2-3.el7*
ImagemagickUbuntubionic*
ImagemagickUbuntucosmic*
ImagemagickUbuntudevel*
ImagemagickUbuntudisco*
ImagemagickUbuntuesm-apps/focal*
ImagemagickUbuntuesm-apps/jammy*
ImagemagickUbuntuesm-apps/noble*
ImagemagickUbuntuesm-infra-legacy/trusty*
ImagemagickUbuntuesm-infra/bionic*
ImagemagickUbuntuesm-infra/xenial*
ImagemagickUbuntufocal*
ImagemagickUbuntujammy*
ImagemagickUbuntukinetic*
ImagemagickUbuntulunar*
ImagemagickUbuntumantic*
ImagemagickUbuntunoble*
ImagemagickUbuntuoracular*
ImagemagickUbuntutrusty*
ImagemagickUbuntutrusty/esm*
ImagemagickUbuntuxenial*

Potential Mitigations

  • Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:

  • The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.

  • The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute – and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.

References