CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2019-11470

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Published: Apr 23, 2019 | Modified: Nov 21, 2024
CVSS 3.x
6.5
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
7.1 HIGH
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
5.3 LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Ubuntu
LOW

The cineon parsing component in ImageMagick 7.0.8-26 Q16 allows attackers to cause a denial-of-service (uncontrolled resource consumption) by crafting a Cineon image with an incorrect claimed image size. This occurs because ReadCINImage in coders/cin.c lacks a check for insufficient image data in a file.

Weakness

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Imagemagick Imagemagick 7.0.8-26-q16 (including) 7.0.8-26-q16 (including)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 RedHat autotrace-0:0.31.1-38.el7 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 RedHat emacs-1:24.3-23.el7 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 RedHat ImageMagick-0:6.9.10.68-3.el7 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 RedHat inkscape-0:0.92.2-3.el7 *
Imagemagick Ubuntu bionic *
Imagemagick Ubuntu cosmic *
Imagemagick Ubuntu devel *
Imagemagick Ubuntu disco *
Imagemagick Ubuntu esm-apps/focal *
Imagemagick Ubuntu esm-apps/jammy *
Imagemagick Ubuntu esm-apps/noble *
Imagemagick Ubuntu esm-infra-legacy/trusty *
Imagemagick Ubuntu esm-infra/bionic *
Imagemagick Ubuntu esm-infra/xenial *
Imagemagick Ubuntu focal *
Imagemagick Ubuntu jammy *
Imagemagick Ubuntu kinetic *
Imagemagick Ubuntu lunar *
Imagemagick Ubuntu mantic *
Imagemagick Ubuntu noble *
Imagemagick Ubuntu oracular *
Imagemagick Ubuntu trusty *
Imagemagick Ubuntu trusty/esm *
Imagemagick Ubuntu xenial *

Potential Mitigations

  • Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:

  • The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.

  • The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute – and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.

References