There is an issue in all samba 4.11.x versions before 4.11.5, all samba 4.10.x versions before 4.10.12 and all samba 4.9.x versions before 4.9.18, where the removal of the right to create or modify a subtree would not automatically be taken away on all domain controllers.
The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.
Name | Vendor | Start Version | End Version |
---|---|---|---|
Samba | Samba | 4.0.0 (including) | 4.9.18 (excluding) |
Samba | Samba | 4.10.0 (including) | 4.10.12 (excluding) |
Samba | Samba | 4.11.0 (including) | 4.11.5 (excluding) |
Samba | Ubuntu | bionic | * |
Samba | Ubuntu | devel | * |
Samba | Ubuntu | disco | * |
Samba | Ubuntu | eoan | * |
Samba | Ubuntu | esm-infra-legacy/trusty | * |
Samba | Ubuntu | esm-infra/xenial | * |
Samba | Ubuntu | focal | * |
Samba | Ubuntu | groovy | * |
Samba | Ubuntu | hirsute | * |
Samba | Ubuntu | impish | * |
Samba | Ubuntu | jammy | * |
Samba | Ubuntu | kinetic | * |
Samba | Ubuntu | lunar | * |
Samba | Ubuntu | mantic | * |
Samba | Ubuntu | noble | * |
Samba | Ubuntu | oracular | * |
Samba | Ubuntu | precise/esm | * |
Samba | Ubuntu | trusty | * |
Samba | Ubuntu | trusty/esm | * |
Samba | Ubuntu | upstream | * |
Samba | Ubuntu | xenial | * |
Access control involves the use of several protection mechanisms such as:
When any mechanism is not applied or otherwise fails, attackers can compromise the security of the product by gaining privileges, reading sensitive information, executing commands, evading detection, etc. There are two distinct behaviors that can introduce access control weaknesses: