CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2019-25013

Out-of-bounds Read

Published: Jan 04, 2021 | Modified: Nov 09, 2023
CVSS 3.x
5.9
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
7.1 HIGH
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
4.8 MODERATE
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Ubuntu
LOW

The iconv feature in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) through 2.32, when processing invalid multi-byte input sequences in the EUC-KR encoding, may have a buffer over-read.

Weakness

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Glibc Gnu * 2.32 (including)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 RedHat glibc-0:2.17-322.el7_9 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 RedHat glibc-0:2.28-151.el8 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 RedHat glibc-0:2.28-151.el8 *
Red Hat OpenShift Do RedHat openshiftdo/odo-init-image-rhel7:1.1.3-2 *
Eglibc Ubuntu esm-infra-legacy/trusty *
Eglibc Ubuntu precise/esm *
Eglibc Ubuntu trusty *
Eglibc Ubuntu trusty/esm *
Glibc Ubuntu bionic *
Glibc Ubuntu esm-infra/xenial *
Glibc Ubuntu focal *
Glibc Ubuntu groovy *
Glibc Ubuntu trusty *
Glibc Ubuntu xenial *

Potential Mitigations

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • To reduce the likelihood of introducing an out-of-bounds read, ensure that you validate and ensure correct calculations for any length argument, buffer size calculation, or offset. Be especially careful of relying on a sentinel (i.e. special character such as NUL) in untrusted inputs.

References