CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2019-5419

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Published: Mar 27, 2019 | Modified: Nov 21, 2024
CVSS 3.x
7.5
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
7.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
5.9 MODERATE
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Ubuntu
MEDIUM
root.io logo minimus.io logo echo.ai logo

There is a possible denial of service vulnerability in Action View (Rails) <5.2.2.1, <5.1.6.2, <5.0.7.2, <4.2.11.1 where specially crafted accept headers can cause action view to consume 100% cpu and make the server unresponsive.

Weakness

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

Affected Software

NameVendorStart VersionEnd Version
RailsRubyonrails*4.2.11.1 (excluding)
RailsRubyonrails5.0.0 (including)5.0.7.2 (excluding)
RailsRubyonrails5.1.0 (including)5.1.6.2 (excluding)
RailsRubyonrails5.2.0 (including)5.2.2.1 (excluding)
CloudForms Management Engine 5.10RedHatansible-tower-0:3.4.3-1.el7at*
CloudForms Management Engine 5.10RedHatcfme-0:5.10.3.3-1.el7cf*
CloudForms Management Engine 5.10RedHatcfme-amazon-smartstate-0:5.10.3.3-1.el7cf*
CloudForms Management Engine 5.10RedHatcfme-appliance-0:5.10.3.3-1.el7cf*
CloudForms Management Engine 5.10RedHatcfme-gemset-0:5.10.3.3-1.el7cf*
CloudForms Management Engine 5.9RedHatcfme-0:5.9.9.3-1.el7cf*
CloudForms Management Engine 5.9RedHatcfme-amazon-smartstate-0:5.9.9.3-1.el7cf*
CloudForms Management Engine 5.9RedHatcfme-appliance-0:5.9.9.3-1.el7cf*
CloudForms Management Engine 5.9RedHatcfme-gemset-0:5.9.9.3-1.el7cf*
Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6RedHatrh-ror50-rubygem-actionpack-1:5.0.1-2.el6*
Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6RedHatrh-ror42-rubygem-actionpack-1:4.2.6-5.el6*
Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7RedHatrh-ror50-rubygem-actionpack-1:5.0.1-2.el7*
Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7RedHatrh-ror42-rubygem-actionpack-1:4.2.6-5.el7*
Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.4 EUSRedHatrh-ror50-rubygem-actionpack-1:5.0.1-2.el7*
Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.4 EUSRedHatrh-ror42-rubygem-actionpack-1:4.2.6-5.el7*
Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.5 EUSRedHatrh-ror50-rubygem-actionpack-1:5.0.1-2.el7*
Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.5 EUSRedHatrh-ror42-rubygem-actionpack-1:4.2.6-5.el7*
Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.6 EUSRedHatrh-ror50-rubygem-actionpack-1:5.0.1-2.el7*
Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.6 EUSRedHatrh-ror42-rubygem-actionpack-1:4.2.6-5.el7*
RailsUbuntubionic*
RailsUbuntucosmic*
RailsUbuntudisco*
RailsUbuntuesm-apps/bionic*
RailsUbuntuesm-apps/xenial*
RailsUbuntuupstream*
RailsUbuntuxenial*
Rails-4.0Ubuntutrusty*
Ruby-actionpack-3.2Ubuntutrusty*
Ruby-activemodel-3.2Ubuntutrusty*
Ruby-activerecord-3.2Ubuntutrusty*
Ruby-activesupport-3.2Ubuntutrusty*
Ruby-rails-3.2Ubuntutrusty*

Potential Mitigations

  • Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:

  • The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.

  • The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute – and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.

References