CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2019-5604

Out-of-bounds Read

Published: Jul 26, 2019 | Modified: Mar 01, 2023
CVSS 3.x
9.6
CRITICAL
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
8.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:N/A:C
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu

In FreeBSD 12.0-STABLE before r350246, 12.0-RELEASE before 12.0-RELEASE-p8, 11.3-STABLE before r350247, 11.3-RELEASE before 11.3-RELEASE-p1, and 11.2-RELEASE before 11.2-RELEASE-p12, the emulated XHCI device included with the bhyve hypervisor did not properly validate data provided by the guest, allowing an out-of-bounds read. This provides a malicious guest the possibility to crash the system or access system memory.

Weakness

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Freebsd Freebsd 11.0 (including) 11.0 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 11.2 (including) 11.2 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 11.2-p10 (including) 11.2-p10 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 11.2-p11 (including) 11.2-p11 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 11.2-p2 (including) 11.2-p2 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 11.2-p3 (including) 11.2-p3 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 11.2-p4 (including) 11.2-p4 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 11.2-p5 (including) 11.2-p5 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 11.2-p6 (including) 11.2-p6 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 11.2-p7 (including) 11.2-p7 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 11.2-p8 (including) 11.2-p8 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 11.2-p9 (including) 11.2-p9 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 11.2-rc3 (including) 11.2-rc3 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 11.3 (including) 11.3 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 12.0 (including) 12.0 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 12.0-p1 (including) 12.0-p1 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 12.0-p2 (including) 12.0-p2 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 12.0-p3 (including) 12.0-p3 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 12.0-p4 (including) 12.0-p4 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 12.0-p5 (including) 12.0-p5 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 12.0-p6 (including) 12.0-p6 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 12.0-p7 (including) 12.0-p7 (including)

Potential Mitigations

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • To reduce the likelihood of introducing an out-of-bounds read, ensure that you validate and ensure correct calculations for any length argument, buffer size calculation, or offset. Be especially careful of relying on a sentinel (i.e. special character such as NUL) in untrusted inputs.

References