CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2019-5798

Out-of-bounds Read

Published: May 23, 2019 | Modified: Nov 07, 2023
CVSS 3.x
6.5
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS 2.x
4.3 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
6.5 MODERATE
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

Lack of correct bounds checking in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 73.0.3683.75 allowed a remote attacker to perform an out of bounds memory read via a crafted HTML page.

Weakness

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Chrome Google * 73.0.3683.75 (excluding)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 RedHat firefox-0:60.7.0-1.el6_10 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 RedHat thunderbird-0:60.7.0-1.el6_10 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Supplementary RedHat chromium-browser-0:73.0.3683.75-1.el6_10 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 RedHat firefox-0:60.7.0-1.el7_6 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 RedHat thunderbird-0:60.7.0-1.el7_6 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 RedHat firefox-0:60.7.0-1.el8_0 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 RedHat thunderbird-0:60.7.0-1.el8_0 *
Chromium-browser Ubuntu bionic *
Chromium-browser Ubuntu cosmic *
Chromium-browser Ubuntu devel *
Chromium-browser Ubuntu disco *
Chromium-browser Ubuntu trusty *
Chromium-browser Ubuntu upstream *
Chromium-browser Ubuntu xenial *
Thunderbird Ubuntu bionic *
Thunderbird Ubuntu cosmic *
Thunderbird Ubuntu devel *
Thunderbird Ubuntu disco *
Thunderbird Ubuntu trusty *
Thunderbird Ubuntu upstream *
Thunderbird Ubuntu xenial *

Potential Mitigations

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • To reduce the likelihood of introducing an out-of-bounds read, ensure that you validate and ensure correct calculations for any length argument, buffer size calculation, or offset. Be especially careful of relying on a sentinel (i.e. special character such as NUL) in untrusted inputs.

References