CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2020-12691

Incorrect Authorization

Published: May 07, 2020 | Modified: Nov 21, 2024
CVSS 3.x
8.8
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS 2.x
6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
8.8 IMPORTANT
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Ubuntu
MEDIUM
root.io logo minimus.io logo echo.ai logo

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 15.0.1, and 16.0.0. Any authenticated user can create an EC2 credential for themselves for a project that they have a specified role on, and then perform an update to the credential user and project, allowing them to masquerade as another user. This potentially allows a malicious user to act as the admin on a project another user has the admin role on, which can effectively grant that user global admin privileges.

Weakness

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.

Affected Software

NameVendorStart VersionEnd Version
KeystoneOpenstack*15.0.1 (excluding)
KeystoneOpenstack16.0.0 (including)16.0.0 (including)
Red Hat OpenStack Platform 10.0 (Newton)RedHatopenstack-keystone-1:10.0.3-8.el7ost*
Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13.0 (Queens)RedHatopenstack-keystone-1:13.0.4-3.el7ost*
Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13.0 (Queens) for RHEL 7.6 EUSRedHatopenstack-keystone-1:13.0.4-3.el7ost*
Red Hat OpenStack Platform 15.0 (Stein)RedHatopenstack-keystone-1:15.0.1-0.20200512110437.95b2bbe.el8ost*
Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.0 (Train)RedHatopenstack-keystone-1:16.0.1-0.20200511063421.40cbb7b.el8ost*
KeystoneUbuntubionic*
KeystoneUbuntueoan*
KeystoneUbuntuesm-infra/bionic*
KeystoneUbuntuesm-infra/xenial*
KeystoneUbuntutrusty*
KeystoneUbuntuupstream*
KeystoneUbuntuxenial*

Potential Mitigations

  • Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
  • Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
  • One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.

References