CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2020-25687

Heap-based Buffer Overflow

Published: Jan 20, 2021 | Modified: Nov 07, 2023
CVSS 3.x
5.9
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
7.1 HIGH
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
5.9 MODERATE
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. A heap-based buffer overflow was discovered in dnsmasq when DNSSEC is enabled and before it validates the received DNS entries. This flaw allows a remote attacker, who can create valid DNS replies, to cause an overflow in a heap-allocated memory. This flaw is caused by the lack of length checks in rfc1035.c:extract_name(), which could be abused to make the code execute memcpy() with a negative size in sort_rrset() and cause a crash in dnsmasq, resulting in a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.

Weakness

A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Dnsmasq Thekelleys * 2.83 (excluding)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 RedHat dnsmasq-0:2.79-13.el8_3.1 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.1 Extended Update Support RedHat dnsmasq-0:2.79-6.el8_1.1 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Extended Update Support RedHat dnsmasq-0:2.79-11.el8_2.2 *
Dnsmasq Ubuntu bionic *
Dnsmasq Ubuntu devel *
Dnsmasq Ubuntu focal *
Dnsmasq Ubuntu groovy *
Dnsmasq Ubuntu hirsute *
Dnsmasq Ubuntu impish *
Dnsmasq Ubuntu jammy *
Dnsmasq Ubuntu kinetic *
Dnsmasq Ubuntu lunar *
Dnsmasq Ubuntu mantic *
Dnsmasq Ubuntu noble *
Dnsmasq Ubuntu oracular *
Dnsmasq Ubuntu precise/esm *
Dnsmasq Ubuntu trusty *
Dnsmasq Ubuntu upstream *
Dnsmasq Ubuntu xenial *

Potential Mitigations

  • Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking.
  • D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.
  • Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program’s executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.
  • Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as “rebasing” (for Windows) and “prelinking” (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.
  • For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].

References