CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2020-27265

Stack-based Buffer Overflow

Published: Jan 14, 2021 | Modified: Nov 21, 2024
CVSS 3.x
9.8
CRITICAL
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS 2.x
7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu
root.io logo minimus.io logo echo.ai logo

KEPServerEX: v6.0 to v6.9, ThingWorx Kepware Server: v6.8 and v6.9, ThingWorx Industrial Connectivity: All versions, OPC-Aggregator: All versions, Rockwell Automation KEPServer Enterprise, GE Digital Industrial Gateway Server: v7.68.804 and v7.66, Software Toolbox TOP Server: All 6.x versions are vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow. Opening a specifically crafted OPC UA message could allow an attacker to crash the server and remotely execute code.

Weakness

A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).

Affected Software

NameVendorStart VersionEnd Version
Industrial_gateway_serverGe7.66 (including)7.66 (including)
Industrial_gateway_serverGe7.68.804 (including)7.68.804 (including)
Kepware_kepserverexPtc6.0 (including)6.0 (including)
Kepware_kepserverexPtc6.9 (including)6.9 (including)
Opc-aggregatorPtc- (including)- (including)
Thingworx_industrial_connectivityPtc- (including)- (including)
Thingworx_kepware_serverPtc6.8 (including)6.8 (including)
Thingworx_kepware_serverPtc6.9 (including)6.9 (including)
Kepserver_enterpriseRockwellautomation6.6.504.0 (including)6.6.504.0 (including)
Kepserver_enterpriseRockwellautomation6.9.572.0 (including)6.9.572.0 (including)
Top_serverSoftwaretoolbox6.0 (including)6.9 (including)

Potential Mitigations

  • Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking.
  • D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.
  • Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program’s executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.
  • Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as “rebasing” (for Windows) and “prelinking” (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.
  • For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].

References