Xen through 4.14.x allows guest OS administrators to obtain sensitive information (such as AES keys from outside the guest) via a side-channel attack on a power/energy monitoring interface, aka a Platypus attack. NOTE: there is only one logically independent fix: to change the access control for each such interface in Xen.
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
Name | Vendor | Start Version | End Version |
---|---|---|---|
Xen | Xen | * | 4.14.0 (including) |
Xen | Ubuntu | bionic | * |
Xen | Ubuntu | esm-apps/focal | * |
Xen | Ubuntu | esm-infra/bionic | * |
Xen | Ubuntu | esm-infra/xenial | * |
Xen | Ubuntu | focal | * |
Xen | Ubuntu | groovy | * |
Xen | Ubuntu | hirsute | * |
Xen | Ubuntu | impish | * |
Xen | Ubuntu | trusty | * |
Xen | Ubuntu | xenial | * |
Assuming a user with a given identity, authorization is the process of determining whether that user can access a given resource, based on the user’s privileges and any permissions or other access-control specifications that apply to the resource. When access control checks are not applied, users are able to access data or perform actions that they should not be allowed to perform. This can lead to a wide range of problems, including information exposures, denial of service, and arbitrary code execution.