CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2020-35535

Out-of-bounds Read

Published: Sep 01, 2022 | Modified: Sep 07, 2022
CVSS 3.x
5.5
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
5.5 LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

In LibRaw, there is an out-of-bounds read vulnerability within the LibRaw::parseSonySRF() function (librawsrcmetadatasony.cpp) when processing srf files.

Weakness

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Libraw Libraw 0.20.0 (including) 0.20.0 (including)
Libraw Libraw 0.20.0-rc2 (including) 0.20.0-rc2 (including)
Libraw Libraw 0.20.1 (including) 0.20.1 (including)
Libraw Libraw 0.20.2 (including) 0.20.2 (including)
Libraw Libraw 0.21.0-beta1 (including) 0.21.0-beta1 (including)
Darktable Ubuntu bionic *
Darktable Ubuntu kinetic *
Darktable Ubuntu lunar *
Darktable Ubuntu mantic *
Darktable Ubuntu trusty *
Darktable Ubuntu xenial *
Dcraw Ubuntu bionic *
Dcraw Ubuntu kinetic *
Dcraw Ubuntu lunar *
Dcraw Ubuntu mantic *
Dcraw Ubuntu trusty *
Dcraw Ubuntu xenial *
Digikam Ubuntu bionic *
Digikam Ubuntu kinetic *
Digikam Ubuntu lunar *
Digikam Ubuntu mantic *
Digikam Ubuntu trusty *
Digikam Ubuntu xenial *
Exactimage Ubuntu bionic *
Exactimage Ubuntu kinetic *
Exactimage Ubuntu lunar *
Exactimage Ubuntu mantic *
Exactimage Ubuntu trusty *
Exactimage Ubuntu xenial *
Kodi Ubuntu bionic *
Kodi Ubuntu kinetic *
Kodi Ubuntu lunar *
Kodi Ubuntu mantic *
Kodi Ubuntu xenial *
Libraw Ubuntu trusty *
Libraw Ubuntu upstream *
Libraw Ubuntu xenial *
Rawtherapee Ubuntu bionic *
Rawtherapee Ubuntu kinetic *
Rawtherapee Ubuntu lunar *
Rawtherapee Ubuntu mantic *
Rawtherapee Ubuntu trusty *
Rawtherapee Ubuntu xenial *
Ufraw Ubuntu bionic *
Ufraw Ubuntu trusty *
Ufraw Ubuntu xenial *
Xbmc Ubuntu trusty *

Potential Mitigations

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • To reduce the likelihood of introducing an out-of-bounds read, ensure that you validate and ensure correct calculations for any length argument, buffer size calculation, or offset. Be especially careful of relying on a sentinel (i.e. special character such as NUL) in untrusted inputs.

References