CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2020-3572

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Published: Oct 21, 2020 | Modified: Nov 21, 2024
CVSS 3.x
8.6
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu
root.io logo minimus.io logo echo.ai logo

A vulnerability in the SSL/TLS session handler of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to a memory leak when closing SSL/TLS connections in a specific state. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by establishing several SSL/TLS sessions and ensuring they are closed under certain conditions. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to exhaust memory resources in the affected device, which would prevent it from processing new SSL/TLS connections, resulting in a DoS. Manual intervention is required to recover an affected device.

Weakness

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

Affected Software

NameVendorStart VersionEnd Version
Adaptive_security_applianceCisco*9.6 (excluding)
Firepower_threat_defenseCisco*6.3.0.6 (excluding)
Firepower_threat_defenseCisco6.4.0 (including)6.4.0.10 (excluding)
Firepower_threat_defenseCisco6.5.0 (including)6.6.1 (excluding)
Adaptive_security_appliance_softwareCisco9.8.0 (including)9.8.4.26 (excluding)
Adaptive_security_appliance_softwareCisco9.9.0 (including)9.9.2.80 (excluding)
Adaptive_security_appliance_softwareCisco9.10.0 (including)9.10.1.44 (excluding)
Adaptive_security_appliance_softwareCisco9.12.0 (including)9.12.4.4 (excluding)
Adaptive_security_appliance_softwareCisco9.13.0 (including)9.13.1.13 (excluding)
Adaptive_security_appliance_softwareCisco9.14.0 (including)9.14.1.19 (excluding)

Potential Mitigations

  • Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:

  • The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.

  • The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute – and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.

References