Insufficient policy enforcement in developer tools in Google Chrome prior to 83.0.4103.97 allowed an attacker who convinced a user to install a malicious extension to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted Chrome Extension.
Weakness
During installation, installed file permissions are set to allow anyone to modify those files.
Affected Software
| Name |
Vendor |
Start Version |
End Version |
| Chrome |
Google |
* |
83.0.4103.97 (excluding) |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Supplementary |
RedHat |
chromium-browser-0:83.0.4103.97-1.el6_10 |
* |
| Chromium-browser |
Ubuntu |
bionic |
* |
| Chromium-browser |
Ubuntu |
trusty |
* |
| Chromium-browser |
Ubuntu |
upstream |
* |
| Chromium-browser |
Ubuntu |
xenial |
* |
Potential Mitigations
- Compartmentalize the system to have “safe” areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
- Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
References