CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2020-9862

Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output

Published: Oct 16, 2020 | Modified: Jan 09, 2023
CVSS 3.x
7.8
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS 2.x
6.8 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
7.8 MODERATE
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

A command injection issue existed in Web Inspector. This issue was addressed with improved escaping. This issue is fixed in iOS 13.6 and iPadOS 13.6, tvOS 13.4.8, watchOS 6.2.8, Safari 13.1.2, iTunes 12.10.8 for Windows, iCloud for Windows 11.3, iCloud for Windows 7.20. Copying a URL from Web Inspector may lead to command injection.

Weakness

The product prepares a structured message for communication with another component, but encoding or escaping of the data is either missing or done incorrectly. As a result, the intended structure of the message is not preserved.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Icloud Apple * 7.20 (excluding)
Icloud Apple 11.0 (including) 11.3 (excluding)
Itunes Apple * 12.10.8 (excluding)
Safari Apple * 13.1.2 (excluding)
Ipados Apple * 13.6 (excluding)
Iphone_os Apple * 13.6 (excluding)
Tvos Apple * 13.4.8 (excluding)
Watchos Apple * 6.2.8 (excluding)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 RedHat webkit2gtk3-0:2.28.4-1.el8 *
Qtwebkit Ubuntu trusty *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu bionic *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu devel *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu esm-apps/bionic *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu esm-apps/focal *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu esm-apps/jammy *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu esm-apps/noble *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu esm-infra/xenial *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu focal *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu groovy *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu hirsute *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu impish *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu jammy *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu kinetic *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu lunar *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu mantic *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu noble *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu trusty *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu upstream *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu xenial *
Qtwebkit-source Ubuntu bionic *
Qtwebkit-source Ubuntu esm-apps/bionic *
Qtwebkit-source Ubuntu esm-apps/xenial *
Qtwebkit-source Ubuntu trusty *
Qtwebkit-source Ubuntu xenial *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu bionic *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu devel *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu esm-infra/xenial *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu focal *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu groovy *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu hirsute *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu impish *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu jammy *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu kinetic *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu lunar *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu mantic *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu noble *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu xenial *
Webkitgtk Ubuntu bionic *
Webkitgtk Ubuntu esm-apps/bionic *
Webkitgtk Ubuntu esm-apps/xenial *
Webkitgtk Ubuntu trusty *
Webkitgtk Ubuntu xenial *
Wpewebkit Ubuntu esm-apps/focal *
Wpewebkit Ubuntu focal *
Wpewebkit Ubuntu trusty *
Wpewebkit Ubuntu upstream *

Extended Description

Improper encoding or escaping can allow attackers to change the commands that are sent to another component, inserting malicious commands instead. Most products follow a certain protocol that uses structured messages for communication between components, such as queries or commands. These structured messages can contain raw data interspersed with metadata or control information. For example, “GET /index.html HTTP/1.1” is a structured message containing a command (“GET”) with a single argument ("/index.html") and metadata about which protocol version is being used (“HTTP/1.1”). If an application uses attacker-supplied inputs to construct a structured message without properly encoding or escaping, then the attacker could insert special characters that will cause the data to be interpreted as control information or metadata. Consequently, the component that receives the output will perform the wrong operations, or otherwise interpret the data incorrectly.

Potential Mitigations

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error.
  • Alternately, use built-in functions, but consider using wrappers in case those functions are discovered to have a vulnerability.
  • If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
  • For example, stored procedures can enforce database query structure and reduce the likelihood of SQL injection.

References