CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2021-20221

Out-of-bounds Read

Published: May 13, 2021 | Modified: Nov 07, 2023
CVSS 3.x
6
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
2.1 LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
2.5 LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L
Ubuntu
LOW

An out-of-bounds heap buffer access issue was found in the ARM Generic Interrupt Controller emulator of QEMU up to and including qemu 4.2.0on aarch64 platform. The issue occurs because while writing an interrupt ID to the controller memory area, it is not masked to be 4 bits wide. It may lead to the said issue while updating controller state fields and their subsequent processing. A privileged guest user may use this flaw to crash the QEMU process on the host resulting in DoS scenario.

Weakness

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Qemu Qemu * 4.2.0 (including)
Qemu Ubuntu bionic *
Qemu Ubuntu devel *
Qemu Ubuntu esm-infra-legacy/trusty *
Qemu Ubuntu esm-infra/xenial *
Qemu Ubuntu focal *
Qemu Ubuntu groovy *
Qemu Ubuntu hirsute *
Qemu Ubuntu impish *
Qemu Ubuntu jammy *
Qemu Ubuntu kinetic *
Qemu Ubuntu lunar *
Qemu Ubuntu mantic *
Qemu Ubuntu noble *
Qemu Ubuntu oracular *
Qemu Ubuntu trusty *
Qemu Ubuntu trusty/esm *
Qemu Ubuntu xenial *
Qemu-kvm Ubuntu precise/esm *
Advanced Virtualization for RHEL 8.2.1 RedHat virt:8.2-8020120210603194525.863bb0db *
Advanced Virtualization for RHEL 8.2.1 RedHat virt-devel:8.2-8020120210603194525.863bb0db *
Advanced Virtualization for RHEL 8.3.1 RedHat virt:8.3-8030120210325145214.8f6a38fe *
Advanced Virtualization for RHEL 8.3.1 RedHat virt-devel:8.3-8030120210325145214.8f6a38fe *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 RedHat virt-devel:rhel-8040020210721215855.522a0ee4 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 RedHat virt:rhel-8040020210721215855.522a0ee4 *

Potential Mitigations

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • To reduce the likelihood of introducing an out-of-bounds read, ensure that you validate and ensure correct calculations for any length argument, buffer size calculation, or offset. Be especially careful of relying on a sentinel (i.e. special character such as NUL) in untrusted inputs.

References