CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2021-21391

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Published: Apr 29, 2021 | Modified: Nov 21, 2024
CVSS 3.x
6.5
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
4.3 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu
MEDIUM
root.io logo minimus.io logo echo.ai logo

CKEditor 5 provides a WYSIWYG editing solution. This CVE affects the following npm packages: ckeditor5-engine, ckeditor5-font, ckeditor5-image, ckeditor5-list, ckeditor5-markdown-gfm, ckeditor5-media-embed, ckeditor5-paste-from-office, and ckeditor5-widget. Following an internal audit, a regular expression denial of service (ReDoS) vulnerability has been discovered in multiple CKEditor 5 packages. The vulnerability allowed to abuse particular regular expressions, which could cause a significant performance drop resulting in a browser tab freeze. It affects all users using the CKEditor 5 packages listed above at version <= 26.0.0. The problem has been recognized and patched. The fix will be available in version 27.0.0.

Weakness

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

Affected Software

NameVendorStart VersionEnd Version
Ckeditor5-engineCkeditor*27.0.0 (excluding)
Ckeditor5-fontCkeditor*27.0.0 (excluding)
Ckeditor5-imageCkeditor*27.0.0 (excluding)
Ckeditor5-listCkeditor*27.0.0 (excluding)
Ckeditor5-markdown-gfmCkeditor*27.0.0 (excluding)
Ckeditor5-media-embedCkeditor*27.0.0 (excluding)
Ckeditor5-paste-from-officeCkeditor*27.0.0 (excluding)
Ckeditor5-widgetCkeditor*27.0.0 (excluding)
CkeditorUbuntugroovy*
CkeditorUbuntuhirsute*
CkeditorUbuntutrusty*
CkeditorUbuntuxenial*
Ckeditor3Ubuntubionic*
Ckeditor3Ubuntufocal*
Ckeditor3Ubuntugroovy*
Ckeditor3Ubuntuhirsute*
Ckeditor3Ubuntuimpish*
Ckeditor3Ubuntukinetic*
Ckeditor3Ubuntulunar*
Ckeditor3Ubuntumantic*
Ckeditor3Ubuntuoracular*
Ckeditor3Ubuntuplucky*
Ckeditor3Ubuntutrusty*

Potential Mitigations

  • Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:

  • The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.

  • The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute – and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.

References