CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2021-22984

URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect')

Published: Feb 12, 2021 | Modified: Feb 18, 2021
CVSS 3.x
6.1
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS 2.x
5.8 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu

On BIG-IP Advanced WAF and ASM version 15.1.x before 15.1.0.2, 15.0.x before 15.0.1.4, 14.1.x before 14.1.2.5, 13.1.x before 13.1.3.4, 12.1.x before 12.1.5.2, and 11.6.x before 11.6.5.2, when receiving a unauthenticated client request with a maliciously crafted URI, a BIG-IP Advanced WAF or ASM virtual server configured with a DoS profile with Proactive Bot Defense (versions prior to 14.1.0), or a Bot Defense profile (versions 14.1.0 and later), may subject clients and web servers to Open Redirection attacks. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Software Development (EoSD) are not evaluated.

Weakness

A web application accepts a user-controlled input that specifies a link to an external site, and uses that link in a Redirect. This simplifies phishing attacks.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Big-ip_advanced_web_application_firewall F5 11.6.1 (including) 11.6.5.2 (excluding)
Big-ip_advanced_web_application_firewall F5 12.1.0 (including) 12.1.5.2 (excluding)
Big-ip_advanced_web_application_firewall F5 13.1.0 (including) 13.1.3.4 (excluding)
Big-ip_advanced_web_application_firewall F5 14.1.0 (including) 14.1.2.5 (excluding)
Big-ip_advanced_web_application_firewall F5 15.0.0 (including) 15.0.1.4 (excluding)
Big-ip_advanced_web_application_firewall F5 15.1.0 (including) 15.1.0.2 (excluding)
Big-ip_application_security_manager F5 11.6.1 (including) 11.6.5.2 (excluding)
Big-ip_application_security_manager F5 12.1.0 (including) 12.1.5.2 (excluding)
Big-ip_application_security_manager F5 13.1.0 (including) 13.1.3.4 (excluding)
Big-ip_application_security_manager F5 14.1.0 (including) 14.1.2.5 (excluding)
Big-ip_application_security_manager F5 15.0.0 (including) 15.0.1.4 (excluding)
Big-ip_application_security_manager F5 15.1.0 (including) 15.1.0.2 (excluding)

Potential Mitigations

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • Use a list of approved URLs or domains to be used for redirection.
  • When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
  • For example, ID 1 could map to “/login.asp” and ID 2 could map to “http://www.example.com/". Features such as the ESAPI AccessReferenceMap [REF-45] provide this capability.
  • Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.
  • Many open redirect problems occur because the programmer assumed that certain inputs could not be modified, such as cookies and hidden form fields.

References