CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2021-27040

Out-of-bounds Read

Published: Jun 25, 2021 | Modified: May 13, 2022
CVSS 3.x
3.3
LOW
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS 2.x
4.3 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu

A maliciously crafted DWG file can be forced to read beyond allocated boundaries when parsing the DWG file. This vulnerability can be exploited to execute arbitrary code.

Weakness

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Advance_steel Autodesk 2019 (including) 2019.1.3 (excluding)
Advance_steel Autodesk 2020 (including) 2020.1.4 (excluding)
Advance_steel Autodesk 2021 (including) 2021.1.1 (excluding)
Advance_steel Autodesk 2022 (including) 2022.0.1 (excluding)
Autocad Autodesk 2019 (including) 2019.1.3 (excluding)
Autocad Autodesk 2020 (including) 2020.1.4 (excluding)
Autocad Autodesk 2021 (including) 2021.1.1 (excluding)
Autocad Autodesk 2022 (including) 2022.0.1 (excluding)
Autocad_architecture Autodesk 2019 (including) 2019.1.3 (excluding)
Autocad_architecture Autodesk 2020 (including) 2020.1.4 (excluding)
Autocad_architecture Autodesk 2021 (including) 2021.1.1 (excluding)
Autocad_architecture Autodesk 2022 (including) 2022.0.1 (including)
Autocad_electrical Autodesk 2019 (including) 2019.1.3 (excluding)
Autocad_electrical Autodesk 2020 (including) 2020.1.4 (excluding)
Autocad_electrical Autodesk 2021 (including) 2021.1.1 (excluding)
Autocad_electrical Autodesk 2022 (including) 2022.0.1 (excluding)
Autocad_lt Autodesk 2019 (including) 2019.1.3 (excluding)
Autocad_lt Autodesk 2020 (including) 2020.1.4 (excluding)
Autocad_lt Autodesk 2021 (including) 2021.1.1 (excluding)
Autocad_lt Autodesk 2022 (including) 2022.0.1 (excluding)
Autocad_map_3d Autodesk 2019 (including) 2019.1.3 (excluding)
Autocad_map_3d Autodesk 2020 (including) 2020.1.4 (excluding)
Autocad_map_3d Autodesk 2021 (including) 2021.1.1 (excluding)
Autocad_map_3d Autodesk 2022 (including) 2022.0.1 (excluding)
Autocad_mechanical Autodesk 2019 (including) 2019.1.3 (excluding)
Autocad_mechanical Autodesk 2020 (including) 2020.1.4 (excluding)
Autocad_mechanical Autodesk 2021 (including) 2021.1.1 (excluding)
Autocad_mechanical Autodesk 2022 (including) 2022.0.1 (excluding)
Autocad_mep Autodesk 2019 (including) 2019.1.3 (excluding)
Autocad_mep Autodesk 2020 (including) 2020.1.4 (excluding)
Autocad_mep Autodesk 2021 (including) 2021.1.1 (excluding)
Autocad_mep Autodesk 2022 (including) 2022.0.1 (excluding)
Autocad_plant_3d Autodesk 2019 (including) 2019.1.3 (excluding)
Autocad_plant_3d Autodesk 2020 (including) 2020.1.4 (excluding)
Autocad_plant_3d Autodesk 2021 (including) 2021.1.1 (excluding)
Autocad_plant_3d Autodesk 2022 (including) 2022.0.1 (excluding)
Civil_3d Autodesk 2019 (including) 2019.1.3 (excluding)
Civil_3d Autodesk 2020 (including) 2020.1.4 (excluding)
Civil_3d Autodesk 2021 (including) 2021.1.1 (excluding)
Civil_3d Autodesk 2022 (including) 2022.0.1 (excluding)
Dwg_trueview Autodesk 2022 (including) 2022.1.1 (excluding)

Potential Mitigations

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • To reduce the likelihood of introducing an out-of-bounds read, ensure that you validate and ensure correct calculations for any length argument, buffer size calculation, or offset. Be especially careful of relying on a sentinel (i.e. special character such as NUL) in untrusted inputs.

References