CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2021-30888

URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect')

Published: Aug 24, 2021 | Modified: Nov 07, 2023
CVSS 3.x
7.4
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS 2.x
4.3 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
7.4 MODERATE
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

An information leakage issue was addressed. This issue is fixed in iOS 15.1 and iPadOS 15.1, macOS Monterey 12.0.1, iOS 14.8.1 and iPadOS 14.8.1, tvOS 15.1, watchOS 8.1. A malicious website using Content Security Policy reports may be able to leak information via redirect behavior .

Weakness

A web application accepts a user-controlled input that specifies a link to an external site, and uses that link in a Redirect. This simplifies phishing attacks.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Ipad_os Apple * 14.8.1 (excluding)
Ipados Apple 15.0 (including) 15.0 (including)
Iphone_os Apple * 14.8.1 (excluding)
Iphone_os Apple 15.0 (including) 15.0 (including)
Macos Apple * 12.0.1 (excluding)
Tvos Apple * 15.1 (excluding)
Watchos Apple * 8.1 (excluding)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 RedHat webkit2gtk3-0:2.34.6-1.el8 *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu bionic *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu devel *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu esm-apps/bionic *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu esm-apps/focal *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu esm-apps/jammy *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu esm-apps/noble *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu esm-infra/xenial *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu focal *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu hirsute *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu impish *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu jammy *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu kinetic *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu lunar *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu mantic *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu noble *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu trusty *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu upstream *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu xenial *
Qtwebkit-source Ubuntu bionic *
Qtwebkit-source Ubuntu esm-apps/bionic *
Qtwebkit-source Ubuntu esm-apps/xenial *
Qtwebkit-source Ubuntu trusty *
Qtwebkit-source Ubuntu xenial *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu bionic *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu devel *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu esm-infra/bionic *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu esm-infra/xenial *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu focal *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu hirsute *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu impish *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu jammy *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu kinetic *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu lunar *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu mantic *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu noble *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu upstream *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu xenial *
Webkitgtk Ubuntu bionic *
Webkitgtk Ubuntu esm-apps/bionic *
Webkitgtk Ubuntu esm-apps/xenial *
Webkitgtk Ubuntu trusty *
Webkitgtk Ubuntu xenial *
Wpewebkit Ubuntu esm-apps/focal *
Wpewebkit Ubuntu esm-apps/jammy *
Wpewebkit Ubuntu focal *
Wpewebkit Ubuntu hirsute *
Wpewebkit Ubuntu impish *
Wpewebkit Ubuntu jammy *
Wpewebkit Ubuntu trusty *

Potential Mitigations

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • Use a list of approved URLs or domains to be used for redirection.
  • When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
  • For example, ID 1 could map to “/login.asp” and ID 2 could map to “http://www.example.com/". Features such as the ESAPI AccessReferenceMap [REF-45] provide this capability.
  • Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.
  • Many open redirect problems occur because the programmer assumed that certain inputs could not be modified, such as cookies and hidden form fields.

References