Icinga Web 2 is an open source monitoring web interface, framework, and command-line interface. A vulnerability in which custom variables are exposed to unauthorized users exists between versions 2.0.0 and 2.8.2. Custom variables are user-defined keys and values on configuration objects in Icinga 2. These are commonly used to reference secrets in other configurations such as check commands to be able to authenticate with a service being checked. Icinga Web 2 displays these custom variables to logged in users with access to said hosts or services. In order to protect the secrets from being visible to anyone, its possible to setup protection rules and blacklists in a users role. Protection rules result in ***
being shown instead of the original value, the key will remain. Backlists will hide a custom variable entirely from the user. Besides using the UI, custom variables can also be accessed differently by using an undocumented URL parameter. By adding a parameter to the affected routes, Icinga Web 2 will show these columns additionally in the respective list. This parameter is also respected when exporting to JSON or CSV. Protection rules and blacklists however have no effect in this case. Custom variables are shown as-is in the result. The issue has been fixed in the 2.9.0, 2.8.3, and 2.7.5 releases. As a workaround, one may set up a restriction to hide hosts and services with the custom variable in question.
The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.
Name | Vendor | Start Version | End Version |
---|---|---|---|
Icinga | Icinga | 2.0.0 (including) | 2.7.5 (excluding) |
Icinga | Icinga | 2.8.0 (including) | 2.8.3 (excluding) |
Icingaweb2 | Ubuntu | bionic | * |
Icingaweb2 | Ubuntu | groovy | * |
Icingaweb2 | Ubuntu | hirsute | * |
Icingaweb2 | Ubuntu | impish | * |
Icingaweb2 | Ubuntu | kinetic | * |
Icingaweb2 | Ubuntu | lunar | * |
Icingaweb2 | Ubuntu | mantic | * |
Icingaweb2 | Ubuntu | trusty | * |
Icingaweb2 | Ubuntu | xenial | * |
There are many different kinds of mistakes that introduce information exposures. The severity of the error can range widely, depending on the context in which the product operates, the type of sensitive information that is revealed, and the benefits it may provide to an attacker. Some kinds of sensitive information include:
Information might be sensitive to different parties, each of which may have their own expectations for whether the information should be protected. These parties include:
Information exposures can occur in different ways:
It is common practice to describe any loss of confidentiality as an “information exposure,” but this can lead to overuse of CWE-200 in CWE mapping. From the CWE perspective, loss of confidentiality is a technical impact that can arise from dozens of different weaknesses, such as insecure file permissions or out-of-bounds read. CWE-200 and its lower-level descendants are intended to cover the mistakes that occur in behaviors that explicitly manage, store, transfer, or cleanse sensitive information.