Multiple vulnerabilities in the payload inspection for Ethernet Industrial Protocol (ENIP) traffic for Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass configured rules for ENIP traffic. These vulnerabilities are due to incomplete processing during deep packet inspection for ENIP packets. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending a crafted ENIP packet to the targeted interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass configured access control and intrusion policies that should be activated for the ENIP packet.
The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.
| Name | Vendor | Start Version | End Version |
|---|---|---|---|
| Firepower_threat_defense | Cisco | 6.4.0 (including) | 6.4.0.13 (excluding) |
| Firepower_threat_defense | Cisco | 6.6.0 (including) | 6.6.5.1 (excluding) |
| Firepower_threat_defense | Cisco | 6.7.0 (including) | 6.7.0.3 (excluding) |
| Firepower_threat_defense | Cisco | 7.0.0 (including) | 7.0.1 (excluding) |
| Secure_firewall_management_center | Cisco | 2.9.12 (including) | 2.9.12 (including) |
| Secure_firewall_management_center | Cisco | 2.9.14.0 (including) | 2.9.14.0 (including) |
| Secure_firewall_management_center | Cisco | 2.9.16 (including) | 2.9.16 (including) |
| Secure_firewall_management_center | Cisco | 2.9.17 (including) | 2.9.17 (including) |
| Secure_firewall_management_center | Cisco | 2.9.18 (including) | 2.9.18 (including) |
Access control involves the use of several protection mechanisms such as:
When any mechanism is not applied or otherwise fails, attackers can compromise the security of the product by gaining privileges, reading sensitive information, executing commands, evading detection, etc. There are two distinct behaviors that can introduce access control weaknesses: