CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2021-3520

Integer Overflow or Wraparound

Published: Jun 02, 2021 | Modified: Jun 06, 2024
CVSS 3.x
9.8
CRITICAL
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS 2.x
7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
8.6 MODERATE
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

Theres a flaw in lz4. An attacker who submits a crafted file to an application linked with lz4 may be able to trigger an integer overflow, leading to calling of memmove() on a negative size argument, causing an out-of-bounds write and/or a crash. The greatest impact of this flaw is to availability, with some potential impact to confidentiality and integrity as well.

Weakness

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound, when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This can introduce other weaknesses when the calculation is used for resource management or execution control.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Lz4 Lz4_project 1.8.3 (including) 1.9.4 (excluding)
Red Hat AMQ Streams 2.1.0 RedHat lz4 *
Red Hat AMQ Streams 2.7.0 RedHat *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 RedHat lz4-0:1.8.3-3.el8_4 *
Red Hat Migration Toolkit for Containers 1.4 RedHat rhmtc/openshift-migration-controller-rhel8:v1.4.6-4 *
Red Hat Migration Toolkit for Containers 1.4 RedHat rhmtc/openshift-migration-log-reader-rhel8:v1.4.6-4 *
Red Hat Migration Toolkit for Containers 1.4 RedHat rhmtc/openshift-migration-must-gather-rhel8:v1.4.6-4 *
Red Hat Migration Toolkit for Containers 1.4 RedHat rhmtc/openshift-migration-operator-bundle:v1.4.6-5 *
Red Hat Migration Toolkit for Containers 1.4 RedHat rhmtc/openshift-migration-registry-rhel8:v1.4.6-4 *
Red Hat Migration Toolkit for Containers 1.4 RedHat rhmtc/openshift-migration-rsync-transfer-rhel8:v1.4.6-4 *
Red Hat Migration Toolkit for Containers 1.4 RedHat rhmtc/openshift-migration-ui-rhel8:v1.4.6-4 *
Red Hat Migration Toolkit for Containers 1.4 RedHat rhmtc/openshift-migration-velero-plugin-for-aws-rhel8:v1.4.6-4 *
Red Hat Migration Toolkit for Containers 1.4 RedHat rhmtc/openshift-migration-velero-plugin-for-gcp-rhel8:v1.4.6-3 *
Red Hat Migration Toolkit for Containers 1.4 RedHat rhmtc/openshift-migration-velero-plugin-for-microsoft-azure-rhel8:v1.4.6-4 *
Red Hat Migration Toolkit for Containers 1.4 RedHat rhmtc/openshift-migration-velero-restic-restore-helper-rhel8:v1.4.6-5 *
Red Hat Migration Toolkit for Containers 1.4 RedHat rhmtc/openshift-migration-velero-rhel8:v1.4.6-5 *
Red Hat Migration Toolkit for Containers 1.4 RedHat rhmtc/openshift-velero-plugin-rhel8:v1.4.6-4 *
RHAF Camel-K 1.8 RedHat lz4 *
RHINT Camel-Q 2.7 RedHat lz4 *
Lz4 Ubuntu bionic *
Lz4 Ubuntu esm-infra/xenial *
Lz4 Ubuntu focal *
Lz4 Ubuntu groovy *
Lz4 Ubuntu hirsute *
Lz4 Ubuntu trusty *
Lz4 Ubuntu trusty/esm *
Lz4 Ubuntu upstream *
Lz4 Ubuntu xenial *

Potential Mitigations

  • Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • If possible, choose a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • Use libraries or frameworks that make it easier to handle numbers without unexpected consequences.
  • Examples include safe integer handling packages such as SafeInt (C++) or IntegerLib (C or C++). [REF-106]
  • Perform input validation on any numeric input by ensuring that it is within the expected range. Enforce that the input meets both the minimum and maximum requirements for the expected range.
  • Use unsigned integers where possible. This makes it easier to perform validation for integer overflows. When signed integers are required, ensure that the range check includes minimum values as well as maximum values.
  • Understand the programming language’s underlying representation and how it interacts with numeric calculation (CWE-681). Pay close attention to byte size discrepancies, precision, signed/unsigned distinctions, truncation, conversion and casting between types, “not-a-number” calculations, and how the language handles numbers that are too large or too small for its underlying representation. [REF-7]
  • Also be careful to account for 32-bit, 64-bit, and other potential differences that may affect the numeric representation.

References