There is a NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in VTK before 9.2.5, and it lies in IO/Infovis/vtkXMLTreeReader.cxx. The vendor didnt check the return value of libxml2 API xmlDocGetRootElement, and try to dereference it. It is unsafe as the return value can be NULL and that NULL pointer dereference may crash the application.
The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.
| Name | Vendor | Start Version | End Version |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vtk | Vtk | * | 9.0.0 (including) |
| Vtk | Ubuntu | trusty | * |
| Vtk | Ubuntu | trusty/esm | * |
| Vtk | Ubuntu | xenial | * |
| Vtk6 | Ubuntu | bionic | * |
| Vtk6 | Ubuntu | focal | * |
| Vtk6 | Ubuntu | trusty | * |
| Vtk6 | Ubuntu | trusty/esm | * |
| Vtk6 | Ubuntu | xenial | * |
| Vtk7 | Ubuntu | bionic | * |
| Vtk7 | Ubuntu | focal | * |
| Vtk7 | Ubuntu | kinetic | * |
| Vtk9 | Ubuntu | kinetic | * |
| Vtk9 | Ubuntu | lunar | * |
| Vtk9 | Ubuntu | mantic | * |
| Vtk9 | Ubuntu | oracular | * |
Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:
The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.
The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute – and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.