CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2021-43527

Out-of-bounds Write

Published: Dec 08, 2021 | Modified: Feb 23, 2023
CVSS 3.x
9.8
CRITICAL
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS 2.x
7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
9.8 CRITICAL
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Ubuntu
HIGH

NSS (Network Security Services) versions prior to 3.73 or 3.68.1 ESR are vulnerable to a heap overflow when handling DER-encoded DSA or RSA-PSS signatures. Applications using NSS for handling signatures encoded within CMS, S/MIME, PKCS #7, or PKCS #12 are likely to be impacted. Applications using NSS for certificate validation or other TLS, X.509, OCSP or CRL functionality may be impacted, depending on how they configure NSS. Note: This vulnerability does NOT impact Mozilla Firefox. However, email clients and PDF viewers that use NSS for signature verification, such as Thunderbird, LibreOffice, Evolution and Evince are believed to be impacted. This vulnerability affects NSS < 3.73 and NSS < 3.68.1.

Weakness

The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Nss Mozilla * 3.73 (excluding)
Nss_esr Mozilla * 3.68.1 (excluding)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Extended Lifecycle Support RedHat nss-0:3.44.0-12.el6_10 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 RedHat nss-0:3.67.0-4.el7_9 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.3 Advanced Update Support RedHat nss-0:3.28.4-2.el7_3 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.4 Advanced Update Support RedHat nss-0:3.28.4-18.el7_4 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.6 Advanced Update Support RedHat nss-0:3.36.0-10.2.el7_6 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.6 Telco Extended Update Support RedHat nss-0:3.36.0-10.2.el7_6 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.6 Update Services for SAP Solutions RedHat nss-0:3.36.0-10.2.el7_6 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7 Advanced Update Support RedHat nss-0:3.44.0-8.el7_7 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7 Telco Extended Update Support RedHat nss-0:3.44.0-8.el7_7 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7 Update Services for SAP Solutions RedHat nss-0:3.44.0-8.el7_7 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 RedHat nss-0:3.67.0-7.el8_5 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.1 Extended Update Support RedHat nss-0:3.44.0-10.el8_1 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.1 Update Services for SAP Solutions RedHat thunderbird-0:91.3.0-3.el8_1 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Extended Update Support RedHat nss-0:3.53.1-12.el8_2 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Extended Update Support RedHat thunderbird-0:91.3.0-3.el8_2 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support RedHat nss-0:3.67.0-7.el8_4 *
Red Hat Virtualization 4 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 RedHat redhat-virtualization-host-0:4.3.20-20211202.1.el7_9 *
Red Hat Virtualization 4 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 RedHat redhat-virtualization-host-0:4.4.9-202112061811_8.5 *
Nss Ubuntu bionic *
Nss Ubuntu devel *
Nss Ubuntu esm-infra/xenial *
Nss Ubuntu focal *
Nss Ubuntu hirsute *
Nss Ubuntu impish *
Nss Ubuntu jammy *
Nss Ubuntu kinetic *
Nss Ubuntu lunar *
Nss Ubuntu trusty/esm *
Nss Ubuntu upstream *
Thunderbird Ubuntu bionic *
Thunderbird Ubuntu devel *
Thunderbird Ubuntu focal *
Thunderbird Ubuntu hirsute *
Thunderbird Ubuntu impish *
Thunderbird Ubuntu jammy *
Thunderbird Ubuntu kinetic *
Thunderbird Ubuntu lunar *
Thunderbird Ubuntu trusty *
Thunderbird Ubuntu upstream *
Thunderbird Ubuntu xenial *

Potential Mitigations

  • Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.

  • For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer.

  • Be wary that a language’s interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.

  • Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.

  • Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking.

  • D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.

  • Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application’s memory:

  • Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program’s executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.

  • Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as “rebasing” (for Windows) and “prelinking” (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.

  • For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].

  • Use a CPU and operating system that offers Data Execution Protection (using hardware NX or XD bits) or the equivalent techniques that simulate this feature in software, such as PaX [REF-60] [REF-61]. These techniques ensure that any instruction executed is exclusively at a memory address that is part of the code segment.

  • For more information on these techniques see D3-PSEP (Process Segment Execution Prevention) from D3FEND [REF-1336].

References