CVE-2022-27632

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rebooter(WATCH BOOT nino RPC-M2C [End of Sale] all firmware versions, WATCH BOOT light RPC-M5C [End of Sale] all firmware versions, WATCH BOOT L-zero RPC-M4L [End of Sale] all firmware versions, WATCH BOOT mini RPC-M4H [End of Sale] all firmware versions, WATCH BOOT nino RPC-M2CS firmware version 1.00A to 1.00D, WATCH BOOT light RPC-M5CS firmware version 1.00A to 1.00D, WATCH BOOT L-zero RPC-M4LS firmware version 1.00A to 1.20A, and Signage Rebooter RPC-M4HSi firmware version 1.00A), PoE Rebooter(PoE BOOT nino PoE8M2 firmware version 1.00A to 1.20A), Scheduler(TIME BOOT mini RSC-MT4H [End of Sale] all firmware versions, TIME BOOT RSC-MT8F [End of Sale] all firmware versions, TIME BOOT RSC-MT8FP [End of Sale] all firmware versions, TIME BOOT mini RSC-MT4HS firmware version 1.00A to 1.10A, and TIME BOOT RSC-MT8FS firmware version 1.00A to 1.00E), and Contact Converter(POSE SE10-8A7B1 firmware version 1.00A to 1.20A) allows a remote attacker to hijack the authentication of an administrator and conduct arbitrary operations by having a user to view a specially crafted page.

Weakness

The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request.

Affected Software

Potential Mitigations

• Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
• For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
• Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
• Use the “double-submitted cookie” method as described by Felten and Zeller:
• When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user’s machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
• Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
• This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]

Related Attack Patterns

• https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/111.html
• https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/462.html
• https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/467.html
• https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/62.html

References

• https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN58266015/index.html
• https://www.meikyo.co.jp/vln/