CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2022-2764

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Published: Sep 01, 2022 | Modified: Nov 21, 2024
CVSS 3.x
4.9
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
4.2 LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Ubuntu
LOW
root.io logo minimus.io logo echo.ai logo

A flaw was found in Undertow. Denial of service can be achieved as Undertow server waits for the LAST_CHUNK forever for EJB invocations.

Weakness

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

Affected Software

NameVendorStart VersionEnd Version
Integration_camel_kRedhat- (including)- (including)
Jboss_enterprise_application_platformRedhat7.0.0 (including)7.0.0 (including)
Jboss_fuseRedhat7.0.0 (including)7.0.0 (including)
Single_sign-onRedhat7.0 (including)7.0 (including)
UndertowRedhat2.0.0 (including)2.2.19 (including)
UndertowRedhat2.3.0-alpha1 (including)2.3.0-alpha1 (including)
UndertowRedhat2.3.0-alpha2 (including)2.3.0-alpha2 (including)
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformRedHatio.undertow/undertow-core:2.2.20.SP1-redhat-00001*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 for RHEL 8RedHateap7-undertow-0:2.2.20-1.SP1_redhat_00001.1.el8eap*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 for RHEL 9RedHateap7-undertow-0:2.2.20-1.SP1_redhat_00001.1.el9eap*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 on RHEL 7RedHateap7-undertow-0:2.2.20-1.SP1_redhat_00001.1.el7eap*
Red Hat Single Sign-On 7RedHatundertow*
Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 7RedHatrh-sso7-keycloak-0:18.0.6-1.redhat_00001.1.el7sso*
Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 8RedHatrh-sso7-keycloak-0:18.0.6-1.redhat_00001.1.el8sso*
Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 9RedHatrh-sso7-keycloak-0:18.0.6-1.redhat_00001.1.el9sso*
RHEL-8 based Middleware ContainersRedHatrh-sso-7/sso76-openshift-rhel8:7.6-20*
UndertowUbuntubionic*
UndertowUbuntufocal*
UndertowUbuntukinetic*
UndertowUbuntuoracular*
UndertowUbuntuplucky*
UndertowUbuntuxenial*

Potential Mitigations

  • Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:

  • The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.

  • The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute – and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.

References