CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2022-29181

Improper Handling of Unexpected Data Type

Published: May 20, 2022 | Modified: Feb 16, 2023
CVSS 3.x
8.2
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
6.4 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:P
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
8.2 IMPORTANT
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

Nokogiri is an open source XML and HTML library for Ruby. Nokogiri prior to version 1.13.6 does not type-check all inputs into the XML and HTML4 SAX parsers, allowing specially crafted untrusted inputs to cause illegal memory access errors (segfault) or reads from unrelated memory. Version 1.13.6 contains a patch for this issue. As a workaround, ensure the untrusted input is a String by calling #to_s or equivalent.

Weakness

The product does not handle or incorrectly handles when a particular element is not the expected type, e.g. it expects a digit (0-9) but is provided with a letter (A-Z).

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Nokogiri Nokogiri * 1.13.6 (excluding)
Red Hat Satellite 6.12 for RHEL 8 RedHat rubygem-nokogiri-0:1.13.8-1.el8sat *
Red Hat Satellite 6.12 for RHEL 8 RedHat rubygem-nokogiri-0:1.13.8-1.el8sat *
Ruby-nokogiri Ubuntu bionic *
Ruby-nokogiri Ubuntu impish *
Ruby-nokogiri Ubuntu kinetic *
Ruby-nokogiri Ubuntu lunar *
Ruby-nokogiri Ubuntu mantic *

Potential Mitigations

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.

References