CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2022-29277

Out-of-bounds Write

Published: Nov 15, 2022 | Modified: Nov 22, 2022
CVSS 3.x
8.8
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu

Incorrect pointer checks within the the FwBlockServiceSmm driver can allow arbitrary RAM modifications During review of the FwBlockServiceSmm driver, certain instances of SpiAccessLib could be tricked into writing 0xff to arbitrary system and SMRAM addresses. Fixed in: INTEL Purley-R: 05.21.51.0048 Whitley: 05.42.23.0066 Cedar Island: 05.42.11.0021 Eagle Stream: 05.44.25.0052 Greenlow/Greenlow-R(skylake/kabylake): Trunk Mehlow/Mehlow-R (CoffeeLake-S): Trunk Tatlow (RKL-S): Trunk Denverton: 05.10.12.0042 Snow Ridge: Trunk Graneville DE: 05.05.15.0038 Grangeville DE NS: 05.27.26.0023 Bakerville: 05.21.51.0026 Idaville: 05.44.27.0030 Whiskey Lake: Trunk Comet Lake-S: Trunk Tiger Lake H/UP3: 05.43.12.0052 Alder Lake: 05.44.23.0047 Gemini Lake: Not Affected Apollo Lake: Not Affected Elkhart Lake: 05.44.30.0018 AMD ROME: trunk MILAN: 05.36.10.0017 GENOA: 05.52.25.0006 Snowy Owl: Trunk R1000: 05.32.50.0018 R2000: 05.44.30.0005 V2000: Trunk V3000: 05.44.30.0007 Ryzen 5000: 05.44.30.0004 Embedded ROME: Trunk Embedded MILAN: Trunk Hygon Hygon #1/#2: 05.36.26.0016 Hygon #3: 05.44.26.0007 https://www.insyde.com/security-pledge/SA-2022060

Weakness

The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Genoa_firmware Amd * 05.52.25.0006 (excluding)

Potential Mitigations

  • Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.

  • For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer.

  • Be wary that a language’s interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.

  • Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.

  • Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking.

  • D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.

  • Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application’s memory:

  • Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program’s executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.

  • Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as “rebasing” (for Windows) and “prelinking” (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.

  • For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].

  • Use a CPU and operating system that offers Data Execution Protection (using hardware NX or XD bits) or the equivalent techniques that simulate this feature in software, such as PaX [REF-60] [REF-61]. These techniques ensure that any instruction executed is exclusively at a memory address that is part of the code segment.

  • For more information on these techniques see D3-PSEP (Process Segment Execution Prevention) from D3FEND [REF-1336].

References