CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2022-30045

Out-of-bounds Read

Published: May 17, 2022 | Modified: Nov 21, 2024
CVSS 3.x
6.5
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
4.3 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
6.5 MODERATE
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

An issue was discovered in libezxml.a in ezXML 0.8.6. The function ezxml_decode() performs incorrect memory handling while parsing crafted XML files, leading to a heap out-of-bounds read.

Weakness

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Ezxml Ezxml_project 0.8.6 (including) 0.8.6 (including)
Mapcache Ubuntu bionic *
Mapcache Ubuntu impish *
Mapcache Ubuntu kinetic *
Mapcache Ubuntu lunar *
Mapcache Ubuntu mantic *
Netcdf Ubuntu bionic *
Netcdf Ubuntu impish *
Netcdf Ubuntu kinetic *
Netcdf Ubuntu lunar *
Netcdf Ubuntu mantic *
Netcdf Ubuntu trusty/esm *
Netcdf-parallel Ubuntu impish *
Netcdf-parallel Ubuntu kinetic *
Netcdf-parallel Ubuntu lunar *
Netcdf-parallel Ubuntu mantic *
Scilab Ubuntu bionic *
Scilab Ubuntu impish *
Scilab Ubuntu kinetic *
Scilab Ubuntu lunar *
Scilab Ubuntu mantic *

Potential Mitigations

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • To reduce the likelihood of introducing an out-of-bounds read, ensure that you validate and ensure correct calculations for any length argument, buffer size calculation, or offset. Be especially careful of relying on a sentinel (i.e. special character such as NUL) in untrusted inputs.

References