CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2022-30953

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Published: May 17, 2022 | Modified: Nov 21, 2024
CVSS 3.x
6.5
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
CVSS 2.x
4.3 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
6.5 MODERATE
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Ubuntu

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Blue Ocean Plugin 1.25.3 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified HTTP server.

Weakness

The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Blue_ocean Jenkins * 1.25.3 (including)
OCP-Tools-4.12-RHEL-8 RedHat jenkins-2-plugins-0:4.12.1686649756-1.el8 *
OCP-Tools-4.13-RHEL-8 RedHat jenkins-2-plugins-0:4.13.1686680473-1.el8 *
OpenShift Developer Tools and Services for OCP 4.11 RedHat jenkins-2-plugins-0:4.11.1683009941-1.el8 *
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.10 RedHat jenkins-2-plugins-0:4.10.1675144701-1.el8 *
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.8 RedHat jenkins-2-plugins-0:4.8.1672842762-1.el8 *
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.9 RedHat jenkins-2-plugins-0:4.9.1675668922-1.el8 *

Potential Mitigations

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
  • Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
  • Use the “double-submitted cookie” method as described by Felten and Zeller:
  • When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user’s machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
  • Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
  • This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]

References